User talk:Tlebo5

Welcome!
Hello, Tlebo5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Aaron Nola has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 22:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, I'm MorbidEntree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Trinity High School (Camp Hill, Pennsylvania) have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. MorbidEntree-(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) (Contribs) (please reply using ) 22:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Isaiah Pead has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Isaiah Pead was changed by Tlebo5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943872 on 2016-11-13T03:59:17+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Isaiah Pead. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Imminent 77   (talk)  04:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

While certainly many, if not all, people can agree with your sentiment about praying for the critically injured Mr. Pead, that is beyond the scope of Wikipedia's purpose and outside its guidelines. See What Wikipedia is not and Words to watch. Among other things, Wikipedia is not a newspaper and does not publish commentary or opinion. Other helpful Wikipedia policy, style and guideline pages include Five Pillars, Identifying reliable sources, Help:Footnotes, Verifiability, No original research, Neutral point of view, Biographies of living persons, Getting started, Introduction to Wikipedia, Simplified ruleset, and Simplified Manual of Style. Also, the information about Mr. Pead should have a footnote in which a reliable, verifiable source is cited. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Isaiah Pead, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 04:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Isaiah Pead. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 04:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:33, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to James Franklin (American football coach)
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (James Franklin (American football coach)), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Marquette King
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Marquette King, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!  D b f i r s   20:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Pete Miller
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Pete Miller), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! MCMLXXXIX 18:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roy Williams (coach). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   01:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Trout, you may be blocked from editing.  General Ization  Talk   01:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Without Me has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Without Me was changed by Tlebo5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951539 on 2017-05-14T03:33:48+00:00.

Edit war
Your recent editing history at Dallas Cowboys shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Something is not right (talk) 01:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)