User talk:Tlsjr

Would you please take your reasons about the changes to the Archbishop Listecki article talk page. I have concerns about Biographies of Living persons and Neutral Point of View. Thank you-RFD (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

No. The references are neutral. It is important that these entries be honest even when you believe that the facts reflect unfavorably on the character of the person. I note that according to your biography you formerly worked for the subject when he was Bishop of LaCrosse. I believe that your personal bias in favor of the subject is overcoming your editorial effort -


 * Most of what you are adding is either a) not related to the guy or b) speculation and accusation by association, all of which is a big BLP issue. Do not add it back without gaining consensus on the talk page :) --Errant[tmorton166] $(chat!)$ 21:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Jerome Edward Listecki. Thank you. Errant[tmorton166] $(chat!)$ 20:04, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

REPONSE: These involve public articles. maybe you should read them instead of deleting them.

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jerome Edward Listecki. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Errant[tmorton166] $(chat!)$ 15:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)