User talk:Tlsworld

February 2009
Refrain from removing sourced material, as you did to Danity Kane and articles related to that article. Such edits are considered vandalism and are reverted. You cannot edit articles to say that that valid reports are rumors, unless you have valid sources saying that the reports are rumors. But even so in Danity Kane's case, valid sources and even a video interview makes clear what was confirmed at that time. Danity Kane was confirmed as completely broken up; that's no rumor. Until a valid source is given saying they are back together or are indeed a trio, we cannot report otherwise. Flyer22 (talk) 07:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:DK3 Danity Kane trio.png
Thank you for uploading File:DK3 Danity Kane trio.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains (talk) 10:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2009: Danity Kane
They are currently no longer a group, and you know that. Stop editing the Danity Kane article to say that they are still a group. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia (temporarily or permanently), seeing as that type of editing is vandalism. Flyer22 (talk) 18:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)