User talk:Tmaldona/sandbox

Tatiana's Peer Review Overall your contribution is filled with excellent information. You did an excellent job of sourcing your facts with citations as well as keeping the statements strictly factual and there are no underlying tones or bias opinions. There is nothing I would change about your contributions! Great Job!

The percentages included in your contribution "79% of those who are exploited are women and children" Help put perspective and statistics of the population and is a reliable addition to your contribution since it answers the question of the female role in Thailands society.

Your first point regarding the key dates helps readers who visit this page understand why human trafficking has such a prominent role in the area and that is because prostitution was deemed legal in " in the 1300s to the 1700s", through this addition readers can connect the past to instances happening in the present.

EGuss (talk) 23:12, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review I think you choose an amazing article to expand on.This is a topic that I don't know much about, but is very interesting. The beginning of your article is very informational ,but I feel that the information was placed in the wrong place. Where you explained the legalization of prostitution that information should not start your insert, you could start it with something very closely related to your topic.

You did good with citing your sources.The article is very good at giving information, but maybe change the order of which you place the information. Amarsha8 (talk) 06:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)