User talk:Tmccc

New user
Hi, You seem very familar with wikipedia policies for a new user. Do you care to explain how? Is this your only account? IRWolfie- (talk) 10:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, this is my only account. I've been anonymous for a few years though and have only recently registered. I've read a lot of discussions during that time and have picked up stuff along the way:) The Energy Catalyzer caught my attention, and there seems to be a lot of arguing and non referenceable claims on both sides of the 'fence'; some of the arguments are because wiki policy isn't being properly explained, and I also see it being used to 'beat new posters around the head'. It would be more useful if common decency were used and then hopefully there would less conflict! Being persistently calm and consistent in applying the policies when allowing or disallowing content would hopefully lead to less edit warring - and of course the editor would be in the right should someone complain about their decisions.


 * Ideally, an editor should only edit something they aren't partisan about! Or perhaps there should be a dispassionate adminstrator assigned to such contentious articles when those articles are still in their infancy? Tmccc (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

Curious
I was curious; is there any specific date you can mention that if an E-Cat is not commercially available by that date you will accept that it won't happen? IRWolfie- (talk) 21:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Now, that would spoil all the fun; who wants deadlines, eh? Enough of those at work... seriously though, I think Jan 2013, if it's real. But who knows? I'm hoping for a resolution soon. Nay or yay, it's been entertaining. Tmccc (talk) 21:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, so January 2013, E-Cats on the shelves and with public customers. IRWolfie- (talk) 21:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it's impossible for him to have something that novel which you or I could go out, buy, and install in the home by then. Certification for industry, and an industrial product seems more likely - if he has real machine, of course! I take it that you think that it's all a bunch of hogwash? Tmccc (talk) 21:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * As it is now June, 2013, and no "industrial product" has been delivered, what are your thoughts now? I think the chances that it is "hogwash" exceeds 99%. How about you?  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  19:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I suppose my attitude w.r.t Rossi can be summed up via one word: "meh". Tmccc (talk) 20:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2016
 News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia
 * News and notes: AffCom still grappling with WMF Board's criteria for new chapters


 * Special report: Olympics readership depended on language


 * In the media: Librarians, Wikipedians, and a library of Wikipedia coverage


 * WikiProject report: Watching Wikipedia


 * Featured content: Entertainment, sport, and something else in-between


 * Traffic report: From Phelps to Bolt to Reddit


 * Technology report: Wikimedia mobile sites now don't load images if the user doesn't see them


 * Recent research: One study encounters critique of its ethics from Wikipedians; another critiques the ethics employed by Wikipedia


 * Blog: Upload of free photos from Swiss library underway

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 16:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC)