User talk:Tmedwards20

Hi
Task 4 of the first assignment said to introduce ourselves to one of our classmates via talk page, so that's what I'm doing right now. I'm Karolin. :-) Who are you?

Article evaluation
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Everything said about Community of Practice in this article are relevant to the topic and nothing really distracted me.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

Nothing in this article seems biased in anyway. If it was I am sure editors from Wiki would edited the biased areas.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

The Citations are there. What’s funny most of the citations you have to pay to read them because they are online journals.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

I like how there is an overview of the concept of Community of Practice and it gave how the concept started and how it evolved over the years. The article could use more of a Sociolinguistic definition and approach of Community of Practice.

Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

There are no talks on this topic but then again I might not be looking in the right area I am still getting familiar with this website. It is kind of a complex website and it will take some time to get used to.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

I do not see a rating for this article, and I don’t think this concept has any WikiProjects. Tmedwards20 (talk) 16:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)