User talk:Tmueller78

Reliable sources
Thanks for the message. As I indicated in my edit summary, I don't believe the source is reliable, given it is a wiki (See WP:UGC). It's also acting as guiding principles for the wiki rather than a statement about coworking in general, and just seems to be the opinions of the authors. --Ronz (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Founders' Pie Calculator
Hi Tmueller78, I've moved your page to Draft:Founders' Pie Calculator for now. I do not believe the page as it stands is ready for mainspace yet. In the draft namespace, you may continue to draft your article here. The current concern I have is that it's unclear if the topic meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline. To pass, the topic should have significant coverage outside of its own field (and no original research). To demonstrate this, make sure you are able to cite reliable verifiable sources. I hope this makes sense, and happy editing. — Andy W. ( talk ) 08:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Dear Andy, I don't agree, and honestly, I'm pretty much fed up with other Wikipedia users deciding what's important and what not.
 * This is the second article in a row where I have this happen, although I'm a generalist and quite aware of what might be interesting information and what wouldn't. Whenever I look for something on Wikipedia and don't find it even though I would expect it there, I think it should be added and add it. If you want to convince me to never ever again try to write an entry to Wikipedia, you're on the right path. It looks like a few people here have significantly to much time on their hands, while others carve out time to add articles they think are useful, which, for me this one would have been in a significant way.
 * I think 7000 results on Google should be enough to consider it noteworthy: https://www.google.de/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=founder+pie+demmler
 * I'll leave it to to decide.
 * Tmueller78 (talk) 14:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I've moved it back to the mainspace, but the issues still stand in my opinion. As Champion had begun curating the page without moving, I don't mind letting that stand. I would recommend you read up on Your first article and WP:SPS at this point. I've tagged the page and put the page in a WikiProject for more visibility. If you are able to find existing Wikipedia articles to link to your own page, that would be great.
 * Another thing: while you may be getting 7k search hits, I personally am not seeing many news sources on the topic. Anyway, thanks, — Andy W. ( talk ) 18:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Dear Andy, thanks for restoring my faith in the Wikipedia system. The article will be improved, I'm currently waiting for one of my employees to prepare the rest of it based on the original article. Once that's done, I'll work on cross-references. I'll read up on what you mentioned. I'm quite surprised how non-intuitive and complex it is to contribute - I find the talk system quite confusing, although I realize there's probably a good reason to do it this way that I don't get yet.

Tmueller78 (talk) 21:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Founders' Pie Calculator
Hello, your article Founders' Pie Calculator was moved into draft space (Draft:Founders' Pie Calculator) because a user claims that it is not ready for mainspace, I see no problems with that, though, if you disagree, feel free to discuss with User:Andy M. Wang. Thank you and happy editing. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)