User talk:Tnt718

May 2013
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Prisoner of Conscious (album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  04:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prisoner of Conscious (album). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  STATic  message me!  04:27, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia and make personal attacks, as you did at User talk: STATicVerseatide, you may be blocked from editing. ''All Music is clearly a reliable source. Another case of vandalism or personal attack on me or anyone else will result in you being blocked.''  STATic  message me!  06:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Marek69, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.  STATic  message me!  07:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Actually, you're not speaking in the third person. You're using the first person plural, which is for use by certain royal persons speaking as monarchs, and otherwise by groups of two plus or by individuals speaking on behalf of a group, company or organisation. We (and I speak for other editors here) see a lot of company name accounts created. The majority of then are purely here for promotional purposes. Some are here to look after their (or their clients') interests without promoting. The rule is 'one account, one individual'. No company accounts, no multi-user accounts. That is not negotiable. As to your editing - if you provide a reliable independent source that's at least as good as the existing one, and preferably better than, then there is no problem. Unfortunately, the word of the subject is not considered independent (and in quite a few cases I've seen, it isn't reliable anyway...). I an not accusing anyone here of lying - I'm explaining WHY we have these seemingly daft rules. For us, FACTS have to be verifiable. That means that they must be found in as reliable a source as possible. And as independent as possible, too. OK? If that's still not clear, it's my bad. Just ask. Peridon (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2013 (UTC)