User talk:Toadally relaxt

Dates
Please don't change them as you have been doing. Both formats are acceptable. See WP:DATE.  Ty  23:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

May 2011
Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Ulf Linde unless there is a valid reason to do so. In general, date formats in articles should correspond to the variety of English that the article is written in. This means that if an article is written about a British or European topic, the day-month-year format should be used, e.g., 12 December 1904. If an article is about an American topic, the month-day-year format should be used, e.g., December 12, 1904. If neither, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in.

Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates. For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this article.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Hut 8.5 09:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Date consistency
Thanks for applying date consistency to some of the articles I (largely) wrote. I am a proponent of that (click to read a discussion in it with my interpretation of the Manual of Style), but I've been very busy lately and haven't had the time to apply it to all pages surrounding Tim Christensen. (Silly of me to do it wrong on Tim Christensen and The Damn Crystals but I used Superior (album) as a template and I hadn't updated its infobox either... until now, haha!)

Just wanted to give you a little encouragement because negative comments usually dominate on Wikipedia... --Eddyspeeder (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

I came to discuss
your recent date change at Girolamo Masini only to discover that you have been told about this for years. Please don't do this. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 13:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 15:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karl Friedrich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

February 2013
Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Bartholomew of Grottaferrata. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 05:54, 22 February 2013 (UTC)