User talk:Tobymarshman

Welcome
Hi, and Welcome to Wikipedia! It's great that you have uploaded Image:Dennis the Menace.jpg and Image:Gnasher.JPG (that article really needed some more images) but you don't seem to have included any copyright information about them. Could you please do so? Thanks! BillyH 16:23, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Pictures
Thanks for adding articles to The Adventures of Tintin, but you've incorrectly labeled them as "copyright Toby Marshman." Cropping an image, drawn by Hergé, of a character owned by Hergé/Moulinsart, does not make you the owner of the image's copyright. It still qualifies as fair use, though. -leigh (&#966;&#952;&#8057;&#947;&#947;&#959;&#962;) 18:27, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ipod Photo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ipod Photo.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 21:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Gnasher.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Gnasher.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 20:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Gnasher.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gnasher.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 20:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Wellingborough_school.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Wellingborough_school.JPG. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 17:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Greetings earthling
Hi T  Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere!  (Whisper...) 17:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Magic roundabout.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Magic roundabout.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:32, 12 August 2011 (UTC)