User talk:TocMan/Archives/2012

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative
Hi DrCruse,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The  Helpful  Bot  16:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Church of Israel
I have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on Church of Israel because the article was discussed at AfD in February 2012 and is therefore permanently ineligible for deletion under the proposed deletion process. Additionally, you did not specify any rationale for deletion, which makes it difficult for uninvolved users to determine whether the page should or shouldn't be deleted. I'm not sure if this would have had any impact on your decision to proposed the article for deletion, but a quick look at the history would have shown you that the article when you found it had a large amount of referenced content removed four days earlier. I have reinstated the last version of the text before that removal took place. Please look that over as well as the previous AfD discussion (linked on the article's talk page), and if you still believe the article should be deleted you may nominate it again at AfD. Note, however, that nominating an article for deletion only a month after being kept at AfD will inevitably result in other editors questioning your motives. Let me know if you have any questions. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 22:22, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Poriferology"
A page you created, Poriferology, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is in a foreign language and exists on another Wikimedia project.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Topher385 (talk) 15:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Poriferology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poriferology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Poriferology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. —Caesura(t) 00:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)