User talk:TocMan/Archives/2014


 * It's been 5 months. PhilKnight (talk) 19:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

So what steps should I take now? Also, why was my friend, BerryTime, unblocked after only five months and with zero edits on Simple or other wikis, even though he was complicit in the same crime? (see User talk:BerryTime) I don't ask to challenge your decision or anything, just wondering what I'm doing wrong. Thanks. DrCruse (talk) 00:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

EDIT: Just going to since it's been five days with no response. Thanks. --DrCruse (talk) 05:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello, DrCruse had mentioned to me that while my unblock appeal was granted, his had been denied. I came to check things out, and had just a few comments to make. My first is a question, wondering why his page states his reason for being blocked as being a sockpuppet of Loganrobert96 when the ban was in fact for creating a fake article and having sockpuppet accounts? That's just me asking for clarity's sake. Also, I understand that it has not been a full six months since his ban, as is outlined in the WP:STANDARDOFFER, but I had not fully reached six months either, and so I would request that you consider that in your decision here. I completely understand wanting to wait another month, I only ask you to consider some amount of leeway here. Also, I wanted to ask, when DrCruse mentioned having edited the Simple English Wikipedia under his account, is that being seen as an avoidance of block, or proof of good will to continue helping the encyclopedia? I was also asked if I had made any edits during my ban, and was under the impression I wasn't supposed to, and so I just wanted to make sure I understood correctly. And lastly, DrCruse and I have talked many times about what we had done on Wikipedia, and while it was done in good humor, it was done to harm, and not to help, and I know that we both understand that now. I am voicing all this here because I am recommending DrCruse for unblock. Having discussed it with him recently, I believe he will cause no further trouble, but will instead be a productive and beneficial member of Wikipedia. Since I am the one recommending him, I understand that it ultimately falls on me if he were to commit vandalism again, and so I hope you understand that I do have full confidence in DrCruse that he will not use his account to ill effect. Thank you for your time. Berry Time  (talk • contribs) 16:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello. I am going to have to consult with the blocking admin before extending the standard offer. what do you think about the application of the standard offer in this case? Chillum 21:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * No objection to standard offer, thanks for checking Chillum. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the quick response. I will be sure to keep an eye on this talk page. Chillum 03:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)