User talk:Tocsgmli

Proposed deletion of Richie Norton


The article Richie Norton has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is a personal resume, not an encyclopedic article. The books are sufficiently notable that A7 isn't appropriate, but I see no way this person meets WP:NAUTHOR or any other specific standard of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richie Norton


A tag has been placed on Richie Norton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Edwardx (talk) 08:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

see references on the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richie_Norton&oldid=800649761

Nomination of Richie Norton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richie Norton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Richie Norton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 09:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Richie Norton
Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Tocsgmli, thanks for creating Richie Norton!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I added notes about the sources. Calling him an "International consultant" and citing sources that do not even mention the word consultant, and similarly referring to him as an "educator" when none of the sources call him that is misleading.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 15:24, 17 September 2017 (UTC)