User talk:Todayilearned

Noel Ashman
I have restored and moved the above article to User:Todayilearned/Noel Ashman.

Please note:
 * 1) The user page will not be indexed by search engines. It is not currently an article, but a draft one, and as such should not be indexed.
 * 2) Should you not work on the page, I will reserve the right to delete it within a suitable time frame
 * 3) Should I look at the references you add, and find that they fail to meet the following criteria, I again erserve the right to delete it:
 * 4) Do not provide the significant coverage of Ashman required
 * 5) Do not verify the information being referenced
 * 6) When you think that it is ready to be moved to the main article space, either let me know and I'll have a look at it, or leave a message at Requests for feedback

Regards,  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 20:15, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Best Regards, Todayilearned (talk) 20:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I have added proper references for the article, although now I feel there may be too many. Should I axe the earlier citations that were "snippets"?
 * Amending to add, I have deleted some references, and feel it is time to go back to the main page. What do you think? Todayilearned (talk) 22:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Put the page up to get some needed help and extra input. Thanks for the help. Let me know if there is anything else I need to do. Todayilearned (talk) 02:08, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Repost of Noel Ashman
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Noel Ashman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noel Ashman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Noel Ashman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Best regards,  Cind.   amuse  (Cindy) 08:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Userfied
User:Todayilearned/Noel Ashman. Thanks, Black Kite (t)   08:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)