User talk:Toekneebe

Hello, Toekneebe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —DoRD (talk) 20:03, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~ I assume you refer to Accendo. It's OK to have an external link to a company on its article page.


 * Since your article had no references to independent' sources, it was difficult to see if it met the notability guidelines, especially as it is a new company.
 * The article appears to just promote the company products, there's nothing about the company, not even where it's located or how many staff
 * It also makes claims which cannot be verified in the absence of suitable references
 * is one of the first electronics companies in the world to bring Digital HID (DHID) ballast technology to the global market.
 * responsible and economical lighting solution 
 *  cost effective
 * provides performance which is reviled by LED
 * brings new life to an already existing robust and proven HID bulb technology.
 *  maximizes the capabilities of HID based lighting systems by increasing the performance of the bulb drastically; in energy efficiency, life expectancy, and light quality, guaranteeing the bulb does not degrade in brightness or luminous efficacy output over the entire meantime before failure rating of the manufacturers HID bulb.
 * Of most benefit is the significant economical and environmental impact of this new technology

Basically it's nothing about the company, just spammy claims about the product without any references to independent sources  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  18:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Accendo Electronics Limited
A tag has been placed on Accendo Electronics Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 00:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Digital ballasts
It's no good dropping in the same piece of advertising copy over and over again. We need references for the rather excited claims made for so-called "digital" ballasts. I see this is your favorite and only article to edit on the Wikipedia, surely you have a book or something around that you could quote for a reliable reference? --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:13, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi Wtshymanski, sorry, I'm still learning Wikipedia. Digital HID is an up and coming technology. Although there are many companies out there (especially in the Asia's and in North America) manufacturing this innovative solution to lighting today, the reach of these companies has been limited by marketing budget really; but all is about to change as major installations of DHID are in the works.

The major players in the lighting World today, such as GE, Philips, Osram-Sylvania for example, dedicated their attention to LED as the solve all for all future lighting. Trials in industry revealed that LED technology was just not ready; it cost a lot more than other lighting types and produced less quality and less sustainable light over the long term (especially in applications requiring long light throw or penetration, as in Street Lighting or Highbay factory lighting or Stadium lighting applications.

More press for the DHID solution is coming and major Power Utilities and Government Offices in Canada and the US already recognize the solution and offer grants and incentives to cover half the project costs of retrofitting existing fixtures/or for new Green installations. Toekneebe (talk) 18:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That's all well and good, but irrelevant to the article issue, which is that a large number of extraordinary claims are being made for the so-called "advantages" of so-called "digital" ballasts, with out any shred of documentation that these advantages in fact exist. I've been looking for articles, or other Reliable sources since last fall and nothing has shown up. It would be really helpful if you could find and quote an article from a respectable industry journal, IEEE or IEE, textbook on lighting design, etc. that supports these many claims. --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:54, 3 September 2010 (UTC)