User talk:Toffolus

July 2017
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Arin Hanson, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Toffolus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zubin12 (talk) 12:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

December 2018
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to PewDiePie. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 08:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Golden Syrup Dumplings (August 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Golden Syrup Dumplings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Golden Syrup Dumplings, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Golden_Syrup_Dumplings Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Golden_Syrup_Dumplings reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:50, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Golden Syrup Dumplings concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Golden Syrup Dumplings, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Golden Syrup Dumplings


Hello, Toffolus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Golden Syrup Dumplings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:35, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Article help
Wonder if you can fix this minor goof in the police interrogation section on Lee Harvey Oswald article: the current words, “went downstairs where he encountered Baker” give the impression Oswald said the encounter took place at the second floor lunchroom but Holmes clarifies that Oswald was talking about encountering the officer at the vestibule on the first floor by the front entrance. Holmes describes two set of doors which were in the building vestibule (which were a front lobby between two set of doors). I propose the paragraph could be rewritten to reflect Holmes’ testimony something like: “Oswald said he was at the first floor vestibule by the front entrance and wanted to see what the “commotion” was when he encountered an officer.”213.107.85.98 (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Character descriptions in List of Kaguya-sama: Love Is War characters
Hi, in List of Kaguya-sama: Love Is War characters, is there a way to condense Tsubame's description so it focuses on her character instead of going through detailed plot summaries, which would be covered by the chapters/episodes? AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at House of Leaves, you may be blocked from editing. Woodroar (talk) 13:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hey Woodroar!
 * I made the edit due to how the page for La Strada says that their Zampano is the namesake for the House of Leaves version. As for the lack of sourcing, I have found several videos theorising on the connection between the book and the film though due to Wikipedia having a fairly mixed relationship with YouTube video sources.
 * I do apologise since it was never officially confirmed that Zampano was named after the La Strada character, and even though I believe the connection is strong enough for the inclusion to be worthy, I can understand why it would be removed
 * Thanks for reading Toffolus (talk) 11:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, judging by your latest edits to the article about Kaguya-sama, you keep doing it. The joking scene where Ai tries to talk Chika into not throwing away her things because she wants attention and her house rent has expired doesn't mean she's declared bisexual and has romantic feelings for her. You have effectively taken the scene out of context by adding questionable information based on your assumptions, which is a crude example of original research. Solaire the knight (talk) 12:44, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Throughout the series the two have been put into various situations that are meant to invoke yuri-themes. Ai tries to kiss Chika in chapter 162, and although it's initially due to wanting to fulfil Chika's desire to be kissed, Chika herself finds Ai attractive when he crossdresses in his maid form, and during their attempt to rescue Kaguya, Chika even says she'd be happy to give Chika a kiss even if it's just once.
 * Furthermore, in the very chapter I sourced, Ai stated that Chika was "the only one for her" and revealed that she stayed over at Chika's place once. Whilst yes, this chapter is technically a dream, the usage of Kaguya's future self that is present in Akasaka's other work, Oshi No Ko, as well as the text that implies the dreams come true, means that these events will likely happen in the future.
 * Furthermore, I did not state that the couple was confirmed or anything like that, in fact I agree that Ai and Chika, especially the latter, prefer men. All I stated that Hayasaka seemed to develop feelings for Chika, which most readers gathered from the chapter judging by both comments on scanlation websites as well as on community forums. I had also made several edits which had been all well sourced and kept up on the same article, so it's clear that my edits for the series try to remain as accurate to the story as possible. Toffolus (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * All of this is speculation based on your interpretations or even just scenes taken out of context. For example, you ignore that when Ai was dressed as a butler, Chika thought she was a guy, or that when she said that "Chika is the only one for her" it was a joke about Kaguya refusing friendly hugs and Chika was the only one around. The kissing topic is a running gag and was also taken out of context by you, which makes it completely a joke about anything else. There is nothing wrong with shipping, but please refrain from adding anything to the main space based on it. Links to abstract readers (I guess I don't need to tell you about the passion of the shippers or how passionate the fans of this ship in particular are, especially since there is no actual proof of it), or the fact that your past edits were left in the article (although as far as I can see, you have already been asked to describe the character himself, and not retell the plot) are all the more no grounds for defending this. Solaire the knight (talk) 13:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, after doing some research, I found the page that references La Strada in the original book
 * On page 552, there are notes that are meant to be written by the character Zampano, which also references pages of a report done on Federico Fellini's films. Those specific pages directly lead to the report's analysis of La Strada. Toffolus (talk) 13:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)