User talk:Togepi 987

Koridai
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Koridai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Koridai. JD554 (talk) 11:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Koridai
I have nominated Koridai, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Koridai. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. JD554 (talk) 11:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Response
Because they meet the criteria at WP:CSD. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:YouTubeproj
Template:YouTubeproj has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 10:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Um
Any particular reason why you vandalized my userpage? --WoohookittyWoohoo! 00:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC) BEcause you deleted my "Youtubeproj" template without my permission. Togepi 987 (talk) 06:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * There is NO excuse to vandalize. None. If you have a problem with a deletion, you can take it to deletion review. Or you have a problem with something I do, write me on my talk page. Do not vandalize my userpage. Or anyone else's for that matter. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 12:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If you had gone about it the right way, I probably would've reversed the deletion and put it back up for a vote. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 12:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

From Now on, you can be the one to delete a page I ask you too

Vandalism
Why did you vandalise my user page?  Maxim (talk)  12:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Because you delete too much. Make even one page, rather than delete them. Togepi 987 (talk) 05:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Final warning
I see you've been vandalising a number of users' userspaces, because they undertook an action that you did not agree with. Your vandalism, and the general attitude that underlies that mentality, is disruptive and harmful to the project. Further vandalism on your part will result in an indefinite block. Please, edit constructively. Anthøny 17:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * As a courtesy note, you are referred to in this thread on Administrators' noticeboard. Anthøny  17:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair-use images
I have deleted these from your user page. Fair-use images are only permitted in Articles, per image policy. Thanks. -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 17:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.

In particular, see. Jehochman Talk 18:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I didn't mean to vandalize.


 * You can post another unblock request. I suggest you promise not to vandalize or disrupt.  List specifically what you did, and say specifically that you won't do it again.  That way we can see that you understand the problem, and that you won't do it again. Jehochman Talk 14:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I vandalized. I promised I will NEVER do it again. I promise. Togepi 987 (talk) 08:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

And the reason I continued to vandalize, is because I failed to see the warnings.

My new account, Sgt_Pikachu5, is not for vandalism. I want a clean start under a new username. Sgt_Pikachu5talk contribs 03:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Sgt_Pikachu5 has been blocked for sockpuppetry and evading a block, understand that creating sock accounts to attempt to get around a block is not going to get you unblocked. Tiptoety  talk 03:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Mah Boi
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Worst Websites
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Worst Websites, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This redirect doesn't have any connection with it's target and the title is self-evidently point of view.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Adam in MO Talk 08:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)