User talk:Together111

Hi, I feel that the summary of this movie-- which is about a feminist (and therefore of a political nature--for surely there are those who are for and against, and in vary degrees and different postures and understandings, against first, second, and third-wave feminism)-- is POV. For example, can someone explain the sense of the concept "{she} was to regard them as nothing more than beasts of burden for her own sexual pleasure."? What does this explicitly mean? What can it mean? That Holder only saw Mexican men as brutish animals and nothing more? I think it is (and the entire summary) is a Rush Limbaugh-type assault on a woman who dared to want to live (and to analyze)a life of sexual freedom.