User talk:Tolhauge

A tag has been placed on GiDetVidere, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth -timed 15:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. --Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth -timed 16:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. --Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth -timed 16:07, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand your intentions with regard to the now-deleted GiDetVidere article. However, aside from the fact the article states the company's objectives for the coming year (which makes the article look like an ad even if it is obvious that the organization is non-profit), there is no indication of what it is that makes the organization notable, that is, why should it even be included in an encyclopedia. the rationale you stated is quite valid when it comes to setting up your own Web site, but not when it comes to inclusion in an encyclopedia. You may want to get familiar with WP:CORP. --Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth -timed 16:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Catchtheeye
A tag has been placed on Catchtheeye, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Catchtheeye and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 15:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Largo Plazo (talk) 16:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC)