User talk:Toll Booth Willie/2012

Query
Sorry to bother you, but how much is the toll? The Interior (Talk) 04:31, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The state chaahges a dollah twenty-five, pop. Cheers. ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e ` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 13:39, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * ( re-reads civility policy ) Say, Willy, isn't that what your (pre-redacted) charges for a (pre-redacted)? The Interior  (Talk) 21:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia Is Not Censored, you (censored)-guzzling (censored)! ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e ` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 21:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Did I do that wrong?
I'm worried I didn't do that right. I thought the goal was to move Trinidad and Tobago's Newsday to Trinidad and Tobago Newsday.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  11:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure how to parse the edit summaries, or what exactly happened here, but between you and User:Guettarda, the desired result has been achieved -- everything is now where it ought to be. Thanks. ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e `` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 15:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Glad it worked out. There's usually a button to push, which carries out the steps, and I did that,but it didn't seem right, so happy that User:Guettarda stepped in.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  16:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Glacier Media
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Responding to your question about the San Francisco Examiner
Willie,

Hi. Sorry to be slow getting back to you, and not sure this is the correct way to respond to your questions regarding the two entries I changed with regard to the San Francisco Examiner, but the SF Weekly article you referred to was based on the same erroneous article that our own paper used to write its story about the Examiner's sale. As far as having additional information, I am afraid that I do not. Above my pay grade ...

Stephen Buel (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2012 (UTC) Stephen Buel

Your HighBeam account is ready!
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know: Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 21:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
 * Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
 * If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Toll Booth!
I saw your name on the Highbeam accounts page. Tool Booth! Yeah, I'm a fan of them. Are you? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry to disappoint but no. My username is taken from Toll Booth Willie, a character created by American comedian Adam Sandler. ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e `` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 02:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Kirksville Daily Express
Hi Willie. Just a heads up. I have access to some local history books (I'm from the Kirksville area) and other resources, so in the next few days I'll try to flesh out the Kirksville Daily Express Wiki you created today with info on its founding, publishers over the years (it was owned for a century or so by one extended family) etc.. It had long been on my mental "to do" list but just never had gotten around to creating an article for it, so thanks! I'll also see what I can scare up on the Macon Chronicle-Herald too. Have a great Wiki kinda day! Sector001 (talk) 05:04, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh, please do! I'm working my way through List of newspapers owned by GateHouse Media creating articles for all the dailies but unfortunately most of them are the barest of stubs -- for some reason GateHouse papers usually don't have very robust "about us" pages on their websites. Glad to see "local" wikieditors taking an interest. Not sure how widely your history books range, but GateHouse has several titles in Missouri - including in Chillicothe, Moberly, Hannibal and Mexico. Cheers! ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 15:26, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:33, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Boston Wiknic
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Meetup/Boston at 14:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC).

List of Major League Baseball stadiums
We would have to pick a different color for a team winning a World Series in their first year in a domed stadium. The only reason why I put a color for World Series won by team in first year is because it has been noted in the other articles. – SNIyer12, (talk), 16:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * It would be better to wikilink the year the stadium opened if it opened with a World Series championship to avoid all the clutter. – SNIyer12, (talk), 16:13, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. When you recently edited Wrapports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glenview, Illinois (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

The Republic
You're correct on the B County category — we do not place an article in both Category A and Category B if one of the two be the parent (or grandparent, etc.) of the other. Just imagine how full some of our upper-level geographic categories, such as Category:United States, would be otherwise. I can't find a good reasoning summary here, but Commons:COM:OVERCAT (which has the same basis in practice and policy) is a very good explanation of why the newspaper shouldn't be in both Category:Columbus and Category:Bartholomew County.

As for the media in Indianapolis — Columbus is not an Indianapolis suburb or exurb, but the principal city of a different metropolitan area. This category also wouldn't be appropriate for media originating in Carmel, Danville, or Greenwood, since they're separate municipalities; this isn't "Media in the Indianapolis television market" or "Media in the Indianapolis metropolitan area". Nyttend (talk) 20:45, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * FYI, the Indianapolis metropolitan area is composed of ten counties, not nine. Nyttend (talk) 20:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Certainly you can understand my confusion when our own article at Media in Indianapolis contains all radio and television stations in the Indianapolis market, not only those in Indianapolis proper or in the Indianapolis MSA. As a random sampling I looked at the eight FM stations with frequencies 100 or above and found that less than half are based in Indianapolis; and two of them are based in Danville and Greenwood, which are places you say would not be covered by "Media in Indianapolis". Both of them (WJJK and WTLC-FM) are categorized in "Category:Radio stations in Indianapolis, Indiana", a child category of "Category:Media in Indianapolis, Indiana". I don't find it intuitive that we would use a broad definition of Indianapolis ("Indy market") for broadcast outlets but a narrow definition ("Indy proper") for print. I can understand a rationale for it (I assume one can pick up a Greenwood radio station on a radio in Indianapolis, whereas one is less likely to find a Greenwood newspaper for sale on most Indianapolis newsstands), but I can also think of rationale against it -- why have different sections of what it ostensibly the same list use different geographic criteria?


 * I accept your FYI that the Indianapolis MSA is 10 counties. For your information, please note that the Wikipedia article on the subject, Indianapolis metropolitan area, notes that it "is often described as the Nine-County Region". ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 00:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)


 * And regarding Commons:COM:OVERCAT, the examples given there tend to counsel against categorizing overly broadly (e.g. putting photos of every man in a "Category:Men" -- to what end?), or double-listing in parent and child articles. The first would apply if I had placed The Republic (Columbus) in "Category:United States" -- but of course I didn't; I agree with you, that would be idiotic, and furthermore would serve the reader no good. The goal of Wikipedia categorization is to serve the reader and place things where they are likely to be sought. Looking at Category:Bartholomew County, I would expect to find a countywide news source included, and if I were a novice to Wikipedia's geographic category nesting scheme, I would not click on "Category:Geographic places in Bartholomew County" expecting to eventually, two categories later, and assuming I knew the name of the county seat, end up in the right city category.


 * As an aside -- I hope I'm not coming off as being nitpicky or argumentative here. I've edited and started several articles about small-city newspapers, so issues around categorization are issues that I have faced several times in the past and expect to do so again. You cared enough about categorization to make changes, so I'm simply trying to use this "conversation" to flesh out a best practice for the future, balancing any consensus of which you may be aware with the decisions that strike me, just another Wikipedia reader and editor, as being most reader-friendly. ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 00:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Our metro area categorisation here goes with official boundaries, because we need a substantive basis rather than "sometimes described as" for making boundaries. I understand what you mean about the categorisation, but we have always employed the rule that articles should not be in parent categories and subcategories, and this is no different.  Don't expect quick replies to any further comments, by the way — I'm at a conference and will only occasionally have Internet access for the next few days.  Nyttend (talk) 01:04, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Toll Booth Willie/Q


A tag has been placed on User:Toll Booth Willie/Q requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Geo. J. Foster Company
An article that you have been involved in editing, Geo. J. Foster Company, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Woodshed (talk) 13:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)