User talk:Tolleranza

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! EdwinHJ | Talk 00:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I've encountered a peculiar problem editing St_Mary's_Church,_Islington and have described the situation on the article's talk page. Any assistance would be really welcome.
 * Hello, I see only one version and that looks ok, what exacly is the problem. Petrb (talk) 12:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I would try to clean your browser cache if you still have troubles with that Petrb (talk) 12:23, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. With a flushed cache, the page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Mary's_Church,_Islington displays the original version of the article written on 11 November, not the latest version written on 14 November. I've replicated the behaviour on three PCs and an iPhone. Clicking on "View history", then "Read", displays the correct (latest) version of the article, with the url http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Mary%27s_Church,_Islington. Subsequent visits to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Mary's_Church,_Islington then display the correct version (presumably from the browser cache). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.85.221 (talk) 16:28, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

The problem still exists. Anyone got any ideas? Tolleranza (talk) 13:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I see This page was last modified on 14 November 2010 at 08:12. at the bottom of the page. Are you behind a proxy with aggressive caching parameters? I think there is no problem here. Calimo (talk) 14:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I also cannot see this problem - I go straight to the 14 Nov version with 8 references. JohnCD (talk) 15:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I too find no problem with this article. The problem must surely be caused by a local cache of come sort, perhaps a proxy cache, or perhaps browser caches. It certainly does not seem to be a problem at Wikipedia's servers, since several different users have no problem. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:23, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

I've verified the problem only occurs when not logged in to Wikipedia. With a cleared browser cache, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Mary's_Church,_Islington gives the original version of the article from 11 November. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Mary%27s_Church,_Islington gives the latest version from 14 November.Tolleranza (talk) 17:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I have filed a report to the Wikipedia developers. They should be able to fix it soon. If you would like to watch it's progress you can see it at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26087 . -- Alpha Quadrant   talk    19:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Harringworth Viaduct.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Harringworth Viaduct.jpg, which you've sourced to S Harvey. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)