User talk:Tolly4bolly/Archive 3

Hi!
Thanks for your reply. Josephjames.me (talk) 19:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Sources for nett gross in India for Bollywood films
BoxofficeIndia.com cannot be used as official reference(tracker) for Bollywood films nett collections in India. BoxofficeIndia is not updating its website on a regular basis ,so the reports og nett collections in India are reported very late on its website.Also, Wikipedia is not able to utilize lists of film grosses created by Box Office India, until permission is provided to the Wikimedia Foundation of permission by Box Office India. Respected critics such as Taran Adarsh and Komal Nahta are giving regualar and genuine nett collection figures in India for Bollywood films.Taran Adarsh has website www.bollywoodhungama.com      and Komal Nahta has website  www.koimoi.com     We can also use OneIndia.com,  The Times of India as sources it doesn’t means that a magazine like Hindustan Times or The hindu will not  report genuine sources ,compared to a not so updated website of BoxofficeIndia.com BoxofficeIndia should be used only when other sources stop giving gross report.First bring a consensus on this nett gross issue. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 20:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Sources for worldwide gross and overseas gross of Bollywood films
BoxofficeIndia has demerit that it is not giving overseas reports of films on a regular basis.It will show figues only once or twice,So u cannot include BoxofficeIndia figures. Also,When u wil see infobox of Holywood films,they have worldwide gross. So try to include worldwide gross which includes domestic gross(nett gross in India+entertainment tax) and overseas gross. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 20:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Sources for nett gross in India for Bollywood films
BoxofficeIndia.com cannot be used as official reference(tracker) for Bollywood films nett collections in India. BoxofficeIndia is not updating its website on a regular basis ,so the reports og nett collections in India are reported very late on its website.Also, Wikipedia is not able to utilize lists of film grosses created by Box Office India, until permission is provided to the Wikimedia Foundation of permission by Box Office India. Respected critics such as Taran Adarsh and Komal Nahta are giving regualar and genuine nett collection figures in India for Bollywood films.Taran Adarsh has website www.bollywoodhungama.com      and Komal Nahta has website  www.koimoi.com     We can also use OneIndia.com,  The Times of India as sources it doesn’t means that a magazine like Hindustan Times or The hindu will not  report genuine sources ,compared to a not so updated website of BoxofficeIndia.com BoxofficeIndia should be used only when other sources stop giving gross report.First bring a consensus on this nett gross issue. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 20:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Its looks ridiculous,that by Monday,August 20,2012 at around 4 pm,the news of Ek tha tiger grossing 100 crore nett in India,came out on www.bollywoodhungama.com and even Taran Adarsh also tweeted the 100 crore figure.crossed in 5 days only.TV news channels like CNN-IBN,Zee-News,ABP News and Aaj Tak all showed 100 crore news of Ek tha Tiger on Monday itself .But BoxofficeIndia figures are so clumpsy and outdated.they showed ek tha tiger crossed 100 crore in 6 days and reported that news on Tuesday,August 21,2012.They even haven’t given reports of Bol Bachchan crossing 100 crore nett in India,while the news has already came out on all TV channels.Can u show me piece of information that Wikipedia wants only this waste crap website www.BoxofficeIndia.com source only? --Ghajinidetails (talk) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Box OfficeIndia gets data directly from the distributors & exhibitors which is supposedly lesser than what the studio / production house reports to trade analysts ... that makes all the difference of nearly Rs 6-7 crores in nett gross always.Like see the case of Singham starring ajay Devgn,which is in 100-crore gross in india according to both Taran adarsh website www.bollywoodhungama.com and Komal Nahta source www.koimoi.com. but BoxofficeIndia has given its nett gross around 98 crores,which is not correct. All people and trade experts will say one data and boxofficeIndia will say some 6-7 crore less data.So try as much to follow other sources,other than BoxofficeIndia.com ,wherever its possible. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Sources for worldwide gross and overseas gross of Bollywood films
BoxofficeIndia has demerit that it is not giving overseas reports of films on a regular basis.It will show figues only once or twice,So u cannot include BoxofficeIndia figures. Also,When u wil see infobox of Holywood films,they have worldwide gross. So try to include worldwide gross which includes domestic gross(nett gross in India+entertainment tax) and overseas gross. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 20:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

BoxofficeIndia doesn’t give overseas information within week.Also it is not generally much detailed.So don’t go for BoxofficeIndia.com as it doesnot give country-by-country breakup of collections. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

This edit to Oliver Turton
Hello. Another time, it might be an idea to check before identifying an edit as test or vandalism, and particularly, before warning an editor for unconstructive editing. This reversion was of a correct edit. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 20:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem, everyone makes mistakes, particularly when editing with scripts. And thank you for going back and removing the warning. If it happens again, perhaps you might consider leaving a note saying something civil like "removing warning issued by mistake, sorry". People don't like being accused of being disruptive when they're not being, but they know that mistakes happen, and an apology might encourage a potential new editor. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 21:00, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Bollywood
Done. Let me know when you're ready for 1944. But I've noticed some 1942 still need adding the cast to.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism Studies Update - August 2012
Hello, members of the Vandalism Studies Project! As some of us are quite new with the Vandalism Studies project, it would make sense for us to re-read some of the past studies, as well as studies outside the project. Please do so if you have a chance, just so we can get into the groove of things. We're planning on attempting to salvage the Obama study (or possibly simply convert it to a new Romney study), as well as hopefully begin our third study this November. If you have any ideas for Study 3, please suggest them! If you have any questions please post them on the project talk page. Thanks, and happy editing - we can't wait to begin working on the project! --Dan653 (talk) and  Theo polisme  :) 11:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC) If you would like to stop receiving Vandalism Studies newsletters, please remove your name from the member list.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Indian Premier League
♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:00, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: A barnstar for you! Aug 29 2012
-- Tito Dutta  ✉  19:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Arjun Kapoor
Hello Torreslfchero, I would like to know what exactly is the change that you did here and why is the Banner shell being removed constantly through Plugin? — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 08:10, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Arjun Kapoor
I feel that my edit to Sushil Kamar's page is entirely constructive as it does in fact highlight a major issue around the event. In fact, I put it to you that you are obstructing the sharing of information and truth. The truth is that there was a controversy, a simple google search would demonstrate this. I feel because you are Indian/ a fan of Sushil you are shielding people from all the facts.

Sincerely, Wrestling fan 82.45.62.90 (talk) 00:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi
Hey listen, I not adding any copyright site link on Kajal Agarwal's page and not adding for promotion. I am adding this only for kajal agarwal's fans. So her fans can easily find a website about her. Please don't remove it, it's not a copyright site so it can be added here. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kajalagarwal78 (talk • contribs) 08:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey thank you for your message. That's really nice of you. Sorry I've just seen that I haven't filled the edit summary field when making edits to pages. I will do it next time. The last edit I've done was to delete an s at the end of "she gaveS" on the Ek Tha Tiger page. --LoveKitkat (talk) 12:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Kajal Aggarwal
Hello, How are you?. I have seen that you have been reverting edits at the Kajal Aggarwal page. If you see the edit history, three users User:BibhutiBBB, User:Kajalagarwal78 and User:Dineshrocky were trying to add the fan club website to the page. What's more interesting is that the three users were created within a span of 4 or 5 days and all of them trying to edit the same page. I think this might be a case of Sock puppetry. I just wanted to know your thoughts on this one. Thanks for reading. krZna (talk) 22:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, I am fine, thanks for asking. And thanks for the reply. Do you have any idea on how we report sock puppetry? I tried reading few pages on this, but was a bit confused. Thanks, krZna (talk) 07:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Madhuri
Can something be done about ? — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 06:47, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Colapsing user page
I tried to collapse the award section on my user page (like other sections) but it didn't go as I expected. It would be great if someone could fix that. Torreslfchero (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The code on the first barnstar wasn't copied across correctly and interfered with the cot template; I've fixed it for you. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 09:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Lionstaken
Can something be done about ? The user is continuously uploading copyvio content and fabricating content. I'm getting really tired. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 04:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: Paoli Dam
Greetings, I have been suggested the same thing here which I have updated in talk page. When the IP range block is over if they come back someone may go to RFPP. Best  Tito Dutta  ✉  17:50, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Harsh (talk)  12:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:31, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page. Happy reviewing!  TheSpecialUser TSU
 * Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)