User talk:Tom.davey

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Abingdon School Boathouse, UK.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Bh oct12th 004.jpg. The copy called Image:Bh oct12th 004.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Abingdon School Boathouse, UK.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Abingdon School Boathouse, UK.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Strangerer (Talk) 11:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Empire Safari
A tag has been placed on Empire Safari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Quantpole (talk) 00:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2011
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Cervix, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. ''Your edit summary for removing an image of cervical mucus is immature and insulting. One would hope that "the reader" would be construed more broadly than "boy or man who is disgusted by female anatomy."'' Drmies (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)