User talk:Tom.schramm

Welcome!
Hello, Tom.schramm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Gravitational lens have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. - DVdm (talk) 12:44, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks and little remarks
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Gravitational lens does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! - DVdm (talk) 15:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Tom, thanks for having provided a source now with this edit. However, I have some little remarks: Anyway, good work. Cheers! - DVdm (talk) 15:05, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) We never capitalize common nouns when we talk about things such as quasars, unless we refer to the article by its name, such as Quasars—see MOS:CAPS. Tricky, I know.
 * 2) The article Quasars was already wikilinked, and we do that only once in an article—see wp:REPEATLINK.
 * 3) The edit summary of your edit was not accurate, and some might find it misleading. Someting like ("Undid revision 829067804 by DVdm (talk) but added a source") would have been correct.