User talk:Tom/Archive12

Biden image
Do you really think Image:Joe Biden, official photo portrait 2-cropped.jpg is a better representation than Image:JoeBidenOfficialCroppedv3.jpg of the source image at http://biden.senate.gov/press/gallery/photos/?id=9ab0db9e-a78b-4af9-9917-c450e5d7c30d? To me, the one you prefer has its color significantly washed out compared to the source. You're an admin, so I can't challenge your change, but I'm curious about your rationale. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks for the explanation and the contrast/brightness adjustment. To my eye it still doesn't match the source, but it's a definite improvement.  Wasted Time R (talk) 03:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

FAR notice
Government of Maryland has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Cirt (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bill (Kill Bill)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bill (Kill Bill), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 20:53, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

o'malley/slots
Tom, I took a stab at revising my original post. I would appreciate your input as it is pointless to post it only to have it deleted again. Thanks.

Chesepioc

Slot Machines Issue
In years past, slot machine gambling has been a heated topic in the General Assembly – both houses in Maryland government. Proponents claim slots could help save Maryland's declining horse racing industry by placing the machines at race tracks, subsidizing racing purses, help fix a structural deficit and provide a new stream of revenue to fund other initiatives. O'Malley's predecessor, Governor Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. (R) made slot machine gambling a priority from the beginning of his four-year term. However, associated legislation was not passed because of opposition mainly from the House and its leader Michael Busch (D).

As Mayor of Baltimore, O'Malley weighed in on the issue in a February 2005 Washington Post article where he remains open to "a reasonable compromise" that would place slots at race tracks but not make the state dependent on the revenue generated by the machines. O'Malley said he considers slots "a pretty morally bankrupt way" to fund education, which bills pending in both chambers of the Maryland General Assembly had called for.

O’Malley reversed his position as governor. In an official press release he stated that “As we continue to work with the Maryland General Assembly to reach consensus, I will introduce a slots proposal that keeps Maryland horse-racing competitive with surrounding states, preserves horse-related agriculture in Maryland, and invests in our shared priorities, like public education, school construction, higher education and community colleges.” Not only had his position changed regarding slots being a "morally bankrupt way" to fund education but so had his assertion that the state not be dependent on the revenue generated by the machines. Lieutenant Governor Anthony Brown remarked in the same release that “Today’s announcement is another important piece of Governor O'Malley's comprehensive, long-term budget solution.”

In October 2007 O'Malley ordered the General Assembly into a special session to address a structural deficit. During the session O'Malley introduced a plan to allow up to 15,000 machines in five locations around the state. Because of previous opposition by legislators O’Malley’s plan allowed the voters to decide if slots machines should be legalized.

O'Malley was unwilling to risk taking a strong leadership stance on the issue as Governor Robert Ehrlich had, electing instead to use his influence from a distance. By late summer the global economy was experiencing a significant slow-down and Maryland suffered a $432 million revenue shortfall. O'Malley used the opportunity to infer that deep cuts to education and public safety, furlough of state workers and more tax increases were possible without the passage of slots to generate revenue. Slots opponents pointed out that even if slots were be legalized the revenue from the program would not be available to the state for several years, thus slots could not help solve the current fiscal crisis as O'Malley repeatedly claimed.

Ron Paul
Ron Paul has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured quality. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Andrew Kelly (talk) 05:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Problems with upload of Image:Ezekielfchambers.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ezekielfchambers.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

One year comparison WikiProject Maryland

 * At the end of November last year there were 1300 articles in the Md. Project
 * At the end of November this year there were 4000 articles in the Md. Project

An increase of 2700 articles.


 * At the end of November last year there were 7 featured articles in the Md. Project
 * At the end of November this year there were 10 featured articles in the Md. Project

An increase of 3 articles.


 * At the end of November last year there was 1 (one) A-class article in the Md. Project
 * At the end of November this year there was 1 (one) A-class article in the Md. Project

An increase of 0 articles.

Just put that out there for the project's consideration.

--«Maryland stater » «reply » 03:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Problems with upload of Image:Joseph_kent_of_maryland.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Joseph_kent_of_maryland.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:35, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Problems with upload of Image:Matthewneely.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Matthewneely.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Holidays!
Thanks for all yer help! Hope you have a good Holiday! Merry             Christmas! --Sallicio$\color{Red} \oplus$ 17:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Project Congress
As a participant of WikiProject U.S. Congress, please consider placing Project Congress to do at the top of your User_talk page. Thank you. —Markles 15:14, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:HBO Recount 2008 banner.png)
Thanks for uploading File:HBO Recount 2008 banner.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Kay Hagan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kay Hagan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Truffaut.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Truffaut.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 13:35, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

"Current" edits
Tom, as I looked at this edit of yours, I thought of two things. First of all, I was wrong at a factual level. Turns out that I got some bad info from the radio, and Janet was not sworn in on Tuesday as I had heard. But on a more significant level, I found myself disagreeing with you, albeit only slightly.

It is a major peeve of mine to read statements in our articles such as "Has been the heavyweight champ for two years," or even, "STS-117 has been in orbit for three days and 17 hours". I trust from your comment that you find these things equally annoying. But in some cases, I think that using the term "current" is perfectly acceptable. The article on Ms. Napolitano is such a case, methinks. When something is likely to be "current" for a significant length of time, such as her tenure at DHS, saying "current" is perfectly fine. Unlike the usage "for two years—", using "current" for a person holding such an office will remain accurate day in and day out until she is finally, in fact, no longer in office. And indeed, even then, for such a prominent personage, the likelihood of an inaccuracy arising from this usage is something approaching zero, because we are Wikipedia, not World Book, and if I hear on the TV that she has died or has resigned has been fired, the article will be corrected before I can boot up my computer.

Now I will acknowledge this: Even if it is acceptable to use "current", if the article can be written smoothly without using it, that might perhaps be best to do so. Indeed, the current version of the article, which says Janet Napolitano is the third United States Secretary of Homeland Security is superior both to my version and the one I changed, which read ''Janet Napolitano. . . has served as United States Secretary of Homeland Security under President Barack Obama since 2009.'' I'm sorry, but I disagree with this usage of "since 2009". When I read "since 2009", I have to check the calendar and check if it's 2010 already. Imagine going to work on Tuesday. There's an employee starting today in the cubicle next to yours. At lunch you mention to your old friends that there's a new guy working next to you. "How long has he been there?" they ask. "Since Tuesday", you say. Sounds pretty odd, doesn't it?

Anyway, no big deal, especially since someone's found a better way this time. I just think that "current" should not always be verboten. Cheers! Un sch ool 03:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Good Article review of Joseph Tydings
Hello - I have reviewed Joseph Tydings, which you listed at the Good Article nominees page. My review of the article can be found here. As you can see, I've raised quite a few issues with the article. Before you panic/become depressed/burn me in effigy, though, here are some things to bear in mind:
 * The points I raise are not necessarily all things that need to be addressed before I list it as a GA. Instead, they are things that I think could improve the article.  In my view, the actual GA status is of secondary importance in the GA process; what's more important is improving the article, and I think that goal is best served by making as many suggestions as possible.
 * In my experience, I'm among the most stringent GA reviewers out there, especially in the "well-written" category, where I tend to review GA and FA candidates in essentially the same way. Again, I do this because I think it's best for the article; however, if you think the points I've raised are too nit-picky or minor and you'd rather not address them, I may be willing to promote the article without them all being addressed.
 * The opinions I express in my GA reviews are just that - my opinions (I also express some things, like grammatical rules or the requirements of WP:V, that are not my opinions). If you disagree with any of my opinions, please say so; you don't need to convince me that you're right, just that your position is a reasonable one. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 14:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Tom - next time you log on could you let me know what's up with this article? It's now been nine days since I reviewed it, and I haven't heard anything from you, though you've been active a few times since then (though only for minutes at a time).  I'm leery of failing, because I think it's very close and I've enjoyed working with you on the past, but I'd like to know what kind of a timeframe we're looking at. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 17:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Tom - I passed the article; good job in addressing the issues I raised. I'll try to have a look at Mathias tomorrow; failing that, sometime on the weekend.  From my recollection it was pretty close to FA quality when I reviewed it, but I also wasn't all that familiar with the FA criteria at the time.  Cheers, Sarcasticidealist (talk) 03:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I've done some light copyediting of the Mathias article and left some comments here. I hope they're helpful. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 17:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Racial Scrubbing at Steele
On January 2, you made a comment on the relevant talk page about the way the "controversy" section on Steele was being censored by an editor with a conspicuous POV. There's been a new development here on the Michael S. Steele article. Not only is the racial context around his RNC election being erased, but as of today, the erasures are disguised as "m" (minor) edits. I don't know what to do next to prevent what I hope is innocent and well-meant but which has the same effect as vandalism and/or censorship to suit a POV. Help? —LisaSmall T/ C 01:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Berwyn Heights, Maryland mayor's residence drug raid
Hi Tom - A week or so ago I completed the GA Review of Berwyn Heights, Maryland mayor's residence drug raid. The article is a nice article, but needs a few tweaks before it can be promoted to GA status. I haven't heard anything back from you on the review page, and no changes have been made in the article. Are you still interested in taking this article to GA? Thanks! Dana boomer (talk) 13:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Brooklyn, Baltimore
Hello, I am not sure exactly who I would contact on this matter. I understand that there are far more productive editors in the wikipedia realm than I but I recently edited the Brooklyn, Baltimore page to state a more appropriate History of the area.

I am sure that no one will debate whether or not there are gangs in Brooklyn but it is certainly not a part of its History and the reference to the fact is not relevant. As wikepedia is a main tool for prospective home buyers, tourist, entrepreneurs, etc. I feel like it should actually have hard data on crime statistics and gang related statements. I then looked at the Baltimore wiki searching for a gang reference but could not find one.

I am not much of the editor as I do not understand html extensively but if you know the person who may edit the Brooklyn page or have the power to do it without it being changed I would greatly appreciate any help.

There is a short book online for free with a more detailed history of Brooklyn and a few resources for community activism that someone editing that page may care to look at. As far as crime data I am sure that everyone at wiki MD knows where to gather such information. For the History http://www.curtisbay.com/bcb_hist/comphist.html and a local community organization http://www.baybrook.net/.

Thanks for all of your work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.16.1.188 (talk) 16:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Just a Thanks
Thank you for all you do to wikipedia, and as a thanks, I give you one dozen cookies, and 2 Interw3bz. Also, I give you a 10. Just stopping by to spread some love!

-Thanks! Devann (talk) 01:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism alert
I don't know exactly where to report vandalism (I'm a little new), and I just picked your username at random. There is some kid vandalising the article Holes (novel). Is there any way you can lock that page from him?

Thanks. Steelrain88 (talk) 9:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Curious
Hey, Tom! Just out of curiosity, what is your take on this RfA? More specifically, the candidate. Thanks!--It's me...Sallicio!$\color{Red} \oplus$ 22:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

UMD governors alumni
Hi, Tom. You removed a blurb about Harry Hughes from the University of Maryland, College Park article with the edit summary mentioning that many Maryland governors have been UMD alumni. I don't believe this to be the case; as far as I know, only Hughes and John Walter Smith were Maryland alums, while Parris Glendening served as faculty. The UMD Alumni hall of fame includes only Hughes. Perhaps you are thinking of University of Maryland, Baltimore, where many governors attended the UM Law School? Thanks for clarifying. Strikehold (talk) 06:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Samuelsmithsenator.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Samuelsmithsenator.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Robertharper.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Robertharper.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Subnational entities list.
That was such a long time ago when I compiled those lists. I believe I did things the hard was, as there were no such lists on the site. I went to each country's listing and recorded the largest subnational entities. -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Governor_marvin_mandel_of_maryland.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Governor_marvin_mandel_of_maryland.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Wynn job fair.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wynn job fair.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:15, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

D.C. Meetup, Saturday, June 6, 2009
The 7th DC Meetup dinner will be held this Saturday, June 6th, starting at 5 p.m. The event will be at Bertucci's, near George Washington University and the Foggy Bottom metro station. It will follow the Apps for Democracy open source event at GWU. For details or to RSVP if you haven't already, see Meetup/DC 7. (You have received this announcement because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland, Virginia, or DC.) Delivered by The  Helpful  Bot   at 20:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC) to report errors, please leave a note here.

Census article
Thanks for moving stuff around. I was just eager to get all the new furniture in the article. I knew some of it was redundant (too many couches) and would need to go to the Salvation Army. I like the way you have redesigned the place. --Buster7 (talk) 14:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Disruptive editing?
You left a message on my ip address' userpage. My allegation that "freedom fighter" was as good a label as "terrorist" is disruptive? Please explain. --65.210.136.131 (talk) 03:27, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Volunteer opportunity in Bethesda, Thursday, July 16
The Wikimedia Foundation will be conducting an all-day Academy at the National Institutes of Health, in Bethesda, Maryland, on Thursday, July 16. The team that will be teaching at the Academy, a mix of paid staff and volunteers, is looking for four more volunteers to be teaching assistants, providing one-to-one assistance in workshops whenever a workshop participant has a problem following the instructional directions. (We currently have two editors signed up as teaching assistants, and are looking for a total of six.)

The NIH editing workshops are only for two hours, but volunteers are asked to meet the Wikimedia Foundation team at the hotel in Bethesda at about 7:15 a.m. (time to be finalized shortly) and to stay for the entire day, which ends at 4:30 p.m. Lunch will be provided. (The full schedule can be found here.)

The team is not necessarily looking for expert editors (though they are welcome), just people who can help novices who might get stuck when trying to do some basic things. If you've been an editor for at least 3 months, and have done at least 500 edits, you probably qualify.

If you're interested, please send John Broughton an email. If you might be interested, but would like further information, please post a note on his user talk page, so that he can respond there, and others can see what was asked.

(You have received this posting because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland or DC. --EdwardsBot (talk) 03:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC))

Groves
Regarding this edit, my first reaction was that the article is about Groves, not some senators' political opinions of how the census should be run, and that led me to thoughts of WP:COATRACK. But then I thought, well, it was his nomination for the job, so...maybe it's appropriate. So I've done nothing and instead I'm asking here...how strongly do you feel about the wording in that edit? I'm leaning ever-so-slightly toward "ACORN isn't relevant in his article", but I don't want to come off as being a POV pusher either... I'd appreciate your thoughts. Frank |  talk  16:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry
I apologise for. I am currently getting the hang of a new vandalfighting tool, and I accidently reverted your edit. -- [midnight comet]  [talk]  22:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

D.C. Meetup, Saturday, September 26
The 8th DC Meetup dinner will be held this Saturday, September 26, starting at 6 p.m. The event will be at Burma Restaurant (740 6th St, NW near the Gallery Place-Chinatown Metro station). For details or to RSVP if you haven't already, see Meetup/DC 8. (You have received this announcement because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland, Virginia, or DC.) --EdwardsBot (talk) 07:08, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Gerald Gustafson
Updated the article on Gerald Gustafson. Tried to find more links and add related pages to "unorphan." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdsbassist (talk • contribs) 23:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Tom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Robert L. Swann (comptroller of Maryland) -
 * 2) Melvin Steinberg -

Replaceable fair use File:Samuel_Bogley_bw_photograph.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Samuel_Bogley_bw_photograph.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 10:54, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Education —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sia pittman (talk • contribs) 03:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Education
What are the main points Conley Dalton measured in education? this my e-mail may14sia@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sia pittman (talk • contribs) 04:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Governor william whyte of maryland.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Governor william whyte of maryland.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)