User talk:Tom112233

December 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Tom112233, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to List of countries where Arabic is an official language have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Abbasid Caliphate into List of countries where Arabic is an official language. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello Diannaa,
 * Thank you for your notice. I am sorry.


 * Best regards,


 * Tom--Tom112233 18:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Macedonian Muslims (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Macedonian Muslims (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Macedonian Muslims (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of countries where Arabic is an official language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arab Pakistani ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_countries_where_Arabic_is_an_official_language check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_countries_where_Arabic_is_an_official_language?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

"See also" links to avoid, and changing whitespace
Hi Tom112233, I noticed in the Levantine Arabic article that you added several wikilinks to the "See also" section, that were already linked in the body of the article. According to WP:NOTSEEALSO, this should be avoided. Just wanted to let you know I've deleted them. If you've done this in other articles, would you please delete those? Thanks! --IamNotU (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

One other thing, I noticed you've been removing blank lines after section headers, and adding spaces around section header names (i.e. changing ==Section== to == Section == ). This formatting is optional, and editors are free to choose whichever they like; it makes no difference to the output rendering of the page. So you are not really breaking any rules by changing them, but you are not following a rule either. I would like to point out though, that many (maybe most) editors do prefer spaces after headers. Also, this is the default format, that is created automatically by the Wikipedia software when you use the "New Section" tab. But the main problem is that changing these wholesale in an entire article can make diffs harder to read, when comparing an older version of a page to the current one. The diff will now show the whole article, instead of just the sections that are different. In some cases it's helpful to adjust them, but please consider that making edits that do little else than arbitrarily and unnecessarily change this spacing may be seen as annoying, if not disruptive... thanks! --IamNotU (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Languages of Maldives


The article Languages of Maldives has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "It seems that the subject is not notable enough to have its own article, as Maldives does not have a lot of native languages, and the spoken languages can be covered in a section of the main article Maldives"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dhoru 21 (talk・contribs) 11:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)