User talk:Tom70

I would like to make the Milwaukee, Wisconsin article a little better but how do I go about that? Tom70 13:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Just edit it :) Bjelleklang -  talk Bug Me 15:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:MPTV MOM.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MPTV MOM.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 23:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Milwaukee, Wisconsin:
Your recent edit to Milwaukee, Wisconsin (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 23:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Milwaukee
It is fine that you created a new page for Milwaukee history. However, removing the entire sections of history and geography and colleges/universities might be a bit too rash. Most articles on US cities have sections that briefly discuss these topics, and, in addition, have the links to the more thorough articles. If you want to make major changes (like removing entire sections), you should leave messages on the discussion page saying what you want to do and letting people comment. You would probably find that moving all of the information from a section is not a good idea, but condensing sections into shorter pieces might be a good idea. Some edits are undone, not because they are wrong or vandalism, but rather that they warrant discussion before they are made. -Nicktalk 00:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks...
No problem, please keep me updated. Khoikhoi 01:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

?
I'm not quite sure why you left me a message about Milwaukee? SuzanneKn 18:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Your Edit on Milwaukee
Hi there, if you want to make seperate articles for sections in the Milwaukee, you need to trim the original sections NOT simply removing the whole contents. You should also expand the articles you created. Miaers 20:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Steven Avery.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Steven Avery.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Teresa Halback.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Teresa Halback.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Steve Avery
Because this is what you wrote "Stephen Avery was found guilty of First Degree Intentional Homicide, Innocent of Changing a corpse, and Guilty of handling a firearm on March 18, 2007"

1. "Changing a corpse" he was charged with mutilating a corpse

2. "handling a firearm" he was charged with felon in possesion of a fire arm.

3. All the information was already under the timeline and it was written correctly

4. You Spelled Steven wrong.

--ChesterMarcol 03:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:MPTV MOM.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MPTV MOM.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AveryTrial.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AveryTrial.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 02:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC)