User talk:Tom951

Speedy deletion nomination of OneSafe Password Manager
Hello Tom951,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged OneSafe Password Manager for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 23:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from OneSafe Password Manager, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 06:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

You are at liberty to create a new version at any time. Make sure that you  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.
 * write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * Do not copy text even from your own website. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * You may have a conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

Speedy deletion nomination of OneSafe Password Manager
Hello Tom951,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged OneSafe Password Manager for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 10:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

WP:New editors do not normally start articles on commercial phone/computer apps unless they have a conflict of interest.

There are legal reasons why we cannot accept your advertising, see WP:SPAM, and please undertand that these rules are in place to protect you as much as they are to defend the integrity of the encyclopaedia.

Barney the barney barney (talk) 10:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I see that the article has been tagged again, don't remove it yourself, that will be picked up. The inclusion of a section of only very positive reviews in itself is spammy, especially as you have an obvious COI. Not a reason for deletion, but the technical terms in the lead need explaining or linking. Comparison with your competitors is unlikely to help. Experience suggests that either they meet the Wikipedia criteria better or that they should be deleted too  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  10:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lunabee-studio
Hello Tom951,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lunabee-studio for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 19:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Deb (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)