User talk:TomA113

July 2019
Hello, I'm Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2019 in home video, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 01:06, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of DreamWorks Animation productions, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Spshu (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 in home video, you may be blocked from editing. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 02:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC) Hey!

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 in home video. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 20:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 15:26, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent editing history at 2019 in home video shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 00:59, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 16:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 03:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. N.J.A.  &#124; talk  12:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pixar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 20:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

August 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Pixar; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 20:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Universal Pictures films. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 23:16, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruption. You have been blocked many many times while editing as an IP for making unsourced disputeD changes to articles. You cannot simply create an account and continue the same disruption. You are edit warring across multiple articles; when you add content and are reverted you wait a day or two and restore the content without any discussion or explanation. If this continues once the block expires I imagine you (and your IP range) will be blocked for a much longer time. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 Incorrect information
Hello, I'm Spshu. Your recent edit(s) to the page List of DreamWorks Pictures films appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Spshu (talk) 18:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Information orange.svg Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of DreamWorks Pictures films. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted.  If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again.  If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  Spshu (talk) 14:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of DreamWorks Pictures films, you may be blocked from editing. Spshu (talk) 19:12, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of DreamWorks Pictures films.  Spshu (talk) 22:46, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 23:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)