User talk:TomPaul67

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't WikiLeaks
FYI, WikiLeaks and Wikipedia have no relation to each other - see WP:NOTLEAKS.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
See Sockpuppetry for details on what this is. Basically, it is the misuse of multiple accounts and/or IP addresses in order to mislead others or evade bans or blocks, which is prohibited.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Logging off for the day
This is a test edit TomPaul67 (talk) 07:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Ajneesh Katiyar for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sitush (talk) 09:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

This is totally baseless comment. I will have to report you for violating the Wiki for harassing new users.

July 2011

 * The stylistic quacking seems obvious to me - if the SPI proves I'm wrong, I'll happily apologize and unblock -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

How about you being blocked indef on the grounds that you are partial to a certain opinion. Like I said earlier: You seek to establish what you believe is already true. I posted irrefutable evidence, and now you are saying that I am a sock, but as my writing style doesn't match, I am impersonating. Dude: Be ready to apologize, but I believe that it is an investigation done by your peers. So I see the light. :) Just because you don't want Sutish to be blocked for making 3RR violations, you have blocked me. This confirms my belief.

"An obscure topic suddenly becomes a hotbed, and one editor begins to make virtually identical edits immediately after another is blocked? Sounds like a WP:DUCK very clearly.  Wait until the SPI is complete - as Zebdee says, he'll unblock you if it comes back as a massively technical impossibility " -- I don't agree with your statement that this topic is an obscure one. I went through the logs and can clearly see that many users have been using the talk back feature. I demand an un-partial judgement in this case. Please let me know what is the process to report Boing! said Zebedee for gross violation of admin rights. TomPaul67 (talk) 11:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

By shutting such reasonable requests you are not getting anything other than a disgruntled user base.

TomPaul67 (talk) 11:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

You must first remove the post "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Sitush_reported_by_User:TomPaul67_.28Result:_.29" Zebedee as you are trying to influence the decision on the 3RR violation.

I have now indef blocked User:TomPaul67 as a blatant sock of User talk:Prashantv79 - the quacking was deafening -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Are you not influencing the decision by saying that I was a sock puppet and you have blocked me. TomPaul67 (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I have passed my sockpuppet evidence on to User:Bwilkins, as I believe it is conclusive - the SPI will examine the technical evidence too, so I suggest you just wait for the outcome there. Should it prove you innocent of sockpuppetry, I'll be happy to help you file a report against me then - but for the moment, while you are blocked, you do not have access to the usual reporting channels. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

=
===

TomPaul67 (talk) 12:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Zebedee and SpacemanSpiff seem to be very favorable to this user. They are acting quickly and are blocking other accounts. Please open an investigation for these admins: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SpacemanSpiff http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Boing!_said_Zebedee

Power in the hands of right people is good. Don't make a mockery of the system by preying upon the very same people that make you powerful -- Quote

TomPaul67 (talk) 12:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I think the technical "likely" result of the SPI CheckUser investigation at Sockpuppet investigations/Ajneesh Katiyar, coupled with the compelling bahavioural evidence, makes it pretty much conclusive that this editor is indeed a sock of User:Prashantv79. And I think that, coupled with the editor's persistence in using unblock requests to attack others, means it's time for Talk page access to be suspended here and any further unblock requests to be directed to his original account. If any reviewing admin wants to see my assessment of the behavioural clues, I'll be happy to send it to them (while wishing to avoid WP:BEANS) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * And as this editor is also sending me accusations via email, I suggest it's time for access to that facility to be suspended too -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

=
===== I am not sending you any accusations. I just emailed you as per Wiki guidelines. Please remove the guidelines if you all believe that users shouldn't contest unfair blocks. Please delete this account (my account) permanently as this account has clearly shown what is abuse of powers as has been evident by Zebedee.

TomPaul67 (talk) 13:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

=
======

You seemed to eager to help Sutish. Though I have mailed you all the evidence, you seem to ignore anything against your trusted buddy. WikiPedia should look into NPOV. Especially into yours and Sutish's conduct. By shutting me down you won't achieve anything. You are too quick to block users who don't appear to agree to you.

- Paul TomPaul67 (talk) 13:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I have been repeatedly reporting against Zebedee and still no action is being taken against this editor. All this editor is doing is blocking any user who doesn't agree with Sutish's point of view. Hmm.. Great! Now don't redirect this page to anyone else. I am not a socket puppet. Just kill my access. That should be fine. :) . I hope you do see the light at the end of the tunnel, and I hope you have a great career ahead. I will pray for you.

TomPaul67 (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)