User talk:Tom Pippens

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Tom Pippens, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Red King (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

EU directives in numerical order
That's a great idea for an article or a section. You just volunteered! --Red King (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:View of Gloucester Thomas Hearne.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:View of Gloucester Thomas Hearne.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Forefront 2010 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Forefront 2010. Since you had some involvement with the Forefront 2010 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Fleet Command (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Some tips to help you out!
Hi, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps.  Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type  on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 14:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Simple references
These require two parts;


 * a)

Chzz is 98 years old.

He likes tea.


 * b) A section called "References" with the special code " ";

Named references
Chzz was born in 1837.

Chzz lives in Footown.

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates
You can put anything you like between, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals.

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Here's a little bit of magic which can save you an awful lot of time and effort!
You might want to consider using this tool - (tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py) - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or Special:MyPage/vector.js, or Special:MyPage/monobook.js, and then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page!) It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well all by itself. For those it can't do by itself, it gives you a pull-down (or up) menu of templates to choose from, which you can then fill in manually. Often the problem is "No title found" - sometimes the title is obvious (especially if it's a pdf), but, if not, just open the page yourself and choose something appropriate if there's not already a clear title there. Happy editing! Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 14:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Marshfield skeletons
Hi there - the copright message which appeared here before was added here as part of an automated process; don't panic, we're well aware that the material was originally added a very long time ago, into the other article, by another editor! It's being dealt with - and no blame attaches to you. Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 09:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Help
I've created two pages by mistake


 * Circular 05/05: Planning Obligations
 * Circular 05/05

Tom Pippens (talk) 11:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I redirected one and another has been flagged for deletion. Both should be deleted before long. If you have questions or need help with writing or creating your article, feel free to contact me. You may also choose to create your article in a subpage of your userspace at User:Tom Pippens/Circular 05/05: Planning Obligations. Best regards,  Cind.   amuse  (Cindy) 12:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Circular 05/05: Planning Obligations


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Prioryman (talk) 12:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Fluorite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Prisms and Lenses


 * Stryker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Power pack

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
I have AFDed WP:Dick at Redirects for discussion. This is a courtesy as you are the earliest known contributer that I can ascertain. Tom Pippens (talk) 19:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for notifying me. I posted a comment on the discussion page. As I mentioned on my post... While I do not oppose or support the deletion of the redirect in question, I do feel the chosen median is the wrong one. MFD would be more suitable. Also with the availability of Dick I ponder if the deletion of the redirect would have any impact beyond creating scores of redlinks in archives. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 20:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. ZZArch talk to me 22:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Gordon Cowans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin MacDonald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Terry Hogan
I'm not disputing that Terence Hogan is his name (although technically we don't have a source for that), but per WP:COMMONNAME we don't show any preference for "official" names when naming articles, what's important is what the person is commonly called in English sources. The only cited source we have at the moment (the Daily Mail article) refers to him as either Terry Hogan or Lucky Tel Hogan and doesn't use Terence at all. If somebody were searching for this article they're much more likely to type in one of those names, regardless of what's on his birth certificate or court documents.

Also, regarding the disambiguation page at Terry Hogan, I'm afraid the disambiguation guidelines, like all the guidelines, are far more complicated than "two  hence disambig[uation page]". Specifically, we have to consider whether there's a primary topic. In this case my take is there's one primary topic and one secondary topic—Hulk Hogan is far more well known and so even though it's not his most common name Terry Hogan is far more likely to refer to him—so per WP:DISAMBIG we should use a hatnote on the primary topic to disambiguate rather than a dedicated disambiguation page.

And one last thing: I understand it's frustrating to have a couple of your edits reverted at once, but I strongly recommend following a bold, revert, discuss cycle in future. In short, it says if you disagree with someone reverting your edits then you should open a discussion and reach a consensus, or at least make a bold attempt at compromise version, rather than simply reverting again. Re-reverting a revert isn't very constructive and often leads to edit wars. joe&bull;roet•c 12:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Billy Hill (gangster) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Duncan Campbell and Mangle


 * Bruce Reynolds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to White City


 * Len Deighton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to SAS


 * Shiv (weapon) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Duncan Campbell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Birmingham Boys, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kings Cross and Kingston Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. When you recently edited Christopher Soghoian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Images on the commons
Would you consider loading images to the commons rather than en.wikipedia in future? Example: File:View of Gloucester Thomas Hearne.jpg. thanks. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. When you recently edited Pat Tillman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rose Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Alexander Horn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to William Pitt and Maurus


 * John Wade (author) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Spectator

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

The Black Book
Hi. Nice to see someone else cares about the book also. Please be sure to put citations clearly on the names you add. Thanks.Openskye (talk) 13:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Charles Tremayne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Exposé and Current affairs


 * Gelignite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Kgs


 * Patrick Holland (criminal) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Guerin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Refs
Can you please revisit this reference? RashersTierney (talk) 10:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Liam Tobin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Tim Healy, Joe McGrath, Desmond Fitzgerald and Michael Collins


 * Army Mutiny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to National Army and Michael Collins


 * Eoin O'Duffy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Michael Collins


 * Garret FitzGerald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Joe McGrath

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Army Mutiny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Drumcondra


 * Batt O'Connor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Michael Collins

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Plot to isolate Dublin
Hi, re the addition to the 'Irish Free State Offensive' article, the newspaper report is not accurate.

The disastrous bridge destroying operation in county Dublin was a Dublin IRA affair. There were no cork men invovled and they certainly didn't come from Liverpool. It's laid out in detail in, 'No Surrenders Here! The Civil War Papers of Ernie O'Malley, p192. The plan was discovered from captured the Anti-Treaty officer Liam Clarke that Republicans have planned to destroy all the bridges leading into Dublin. 104 Anti-Treaty fighters were captured in north County Dublin, including their officer Pat Sweeney.

Regards, Jdorney (talk) 09:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Well its in Timeline of the Irish Civil War.

But the incident is quite well documented.

Michael Hopkinson in Green Against Green quotes the National Army report that, "In North County Dublin we picked out the likely bridges and sent patrols to same. In nearly every case the Irregulars were found in teh act of tearing up the bridges. We captured 104 Irregulars, including the officer in chage, Pat Sweeney."

However from the anti-Treaty side, 'No Surrender Here!', p132-133,

Frank Henderson (OC Dublin Brigade IRA) to Ernie O'Malley (Assistant IRA Chief of Staff), 30 August 1922, on the operation of August 5-6, finishes

"The total number engaged in the 2nd Battn [Dublin Brigade] was 146 of all ranks. Of these 58 were captured including the Battalion Comdt." (goes on to list weapons lost etc).

The papers of the time I suspect took a bit of artistic license. Jdorney (talk) 00:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

It's not Ernie O'Malley's writings, it's his papers, published by his son Cormac. The letter in question is printed from Frank Henderson to EOM - so fairly trustworthy I would say.

The anti Treaty IRA didn't have the ability to mount co-ordidnated operations like that, which in fact goes a long way to explaining why they lost the civil war. Though, on looking more closely, I see Hopkinson does mention that 'some Cork men were brought to help'. Henderson does not mention this. But if it was teh case you're looking at a small number. In short, this was a typical, localised and bungled anti Treaty IRA operation. Jdorney (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Pery, Edmond Henry
A tag has been placed on Pery, Edmond Henry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Sir Henry Middleton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Pepper


 * Sultanate of Tidore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Portuguese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
... for starting the article about celebrity drug addict Brenda Dean Paul. She/it's been on my to-do list for a while. Acknowledgement to you on my user page. Cheers! --Seduisant (talk) 15:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Tom
For that article, the sentence "An attacking fullback, his pace and ability to get up and down the flanks creates problems for the opposition" is the trouble which is causing vandalism, which, the edit you pointed out wasn't. It may have been unhelpful, but it's not a pattern and it is not falling into the definition of vandalism by itself.

May I suggest replacing the sentence mentioned with something about his moving to Portugal from Bosingwa at a young age, that will calm things down by at least 70% right there. If you'd like help just ask, as the sentence doesn't have a leg to stand on regardless of the reference given. It doesn't belong in the lead section and must be used as a quote stating who said it if it is to be in the article at all. Penyulap  ☏  22:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * well, it made me smile, and it's true, however I think it is quite possible that you may run into a few people at ani that don't like the manner in which that 'messed up sig' has been done, probably the way the links are arranged for talk straight after person, you might like to put a little more distance between the two, I don't care, and don't take this as a warning, but rather a heads-up on what other editors will think(actually there is a tendency for some people to echo my critique occasionally, usual my own critics though, when I mention faults with my work). Your talents are wasted there :) There are a good few humor pages on wikipedia Penyulap  ☏  00:26, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Ultimate Boot CD listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ultimate Boot CD. Since you had some involvement with the Ultimate Boot CD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 07:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

'68 FORD MUSTANG GT CS listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect &. Since you had some involvement with the '68 FORD MUSTANG GT CS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

"Workgroup or domain" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Workgroup or domain and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)