User talk:Tom da masta

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bubblegum, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bubblegum was changed by Tom da masta (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966362 on 2011-05-16T14:19:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bubblegum with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 14:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bubblegum with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  Wikipelli   Talk   14:20, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bubblegum.  Wikipelli   Talk   14:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

<>

Speedy deletion nomination of Kyle white


A tag has been placed on Kyle white requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 21:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Unblock request
I am fairly certain no administrator would unblock you with that request. You state that you didn't know that you were misusing Wikipedia, but you were warned four times. Your edit to Tracy Chapman is one that even without being warned is clearly vandalism and you knew it. If I could advocate for you I would request that the second chance template be placed on your page. Administrator's need some sort of proof that you will become a valuable contributor to Wikipedia. Ryan Vesey (talk) 17:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)