User talk:Tom k&e

Hi Tom k&e,

Thanks for the stub notice on the Rachelle Waterman article.

I have expanded the article to include more information about the case. I also linked to additional online and print sources that contain additional reporting.

This is a breaking news story, so it may eventually qualify for Wikinews, but it is still too local for that organization. Wikinews currently has an editorial policy that strives for stories with international impact, and they may look down upon posting this story until it achieves some notice in one or more international news outlets.

Thanks for contributing!

Cheers,

--DV 03:05, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Rachelle Waterman as FAC?
Please see the Featured Article Candidate nomination for the Rachelle Waterman article.


 * 1) If you approve of this article, write "Support" followed by your reasons.
 * 2) If you oppose this nomination, write "Object" followed by the reason for your objection.

Thank you for your contribution!

Cheers,

--DV 12:00, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Signing messages
Hi. Thanks for your note on Talk:SR-71 Blackbird. By convention, wikipedia asks its users to sign their messages on talk pages so that other users can identify and find them. You can do this by typing or ~ to sign your name or your name and date/time automatically. Happy editing. -Lommer | talk 17:24, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

D1000
Another editor has added the  template to the article D1000, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Metalslug3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Metalslug3.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Queenshouse.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Queenshouse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Server 2003 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Server 2003. Since you had some involvement with the Server 2003 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Goldenpride.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goldenpride.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Massive lens flare.jpg


The file File:Massive lens flare.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, adds nothing to what we already have available on the subject"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. funplussmart (talk) 23:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)