User talk:Tomandjerry211/Archive 2

M15 Halftrack page
Greetings, User Tomandjerry211. I see you've put a lot of effort into the M15 page bringing it up to Good Page status and beyond. And recognize help from several of the "usual suspects" at military related pages, both at the Military Project page and there.

While looking for a public domain image of the M15 "Special" to add to the page I came across some terrific ones at the top of this post: http://halftrackinfo.com/index.php?topic=663.0, which references this unfortunately defunct page as a source: http://www.antiaircraft.org/T28.htm. They're not definitively US Army photos, and without the provenance there's no way to upload them with a public domain license. I'll look around some more.

A noticed the Infobox photo at the Wikipedia page what is labeled an M15A1 appears to have no twin 50s. (Here's a walkaround of that same halftrack: http://www.primeportal.net/apc/greg_smith/m15a1_aa/index.php?Page=1). I realized it is the exhibit at Fort Lewis Military Museum, but how is it an M15A1 without any Brownings? Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 17:46, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I think the machine guns were removed or destroyed in some way.--Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 17:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Evidently. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 19:58, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M13 Multiple Motor Carriage
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article M13 Multiple Motor Carriage you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 08:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M13 Multiple Motor Carriage
The article M13 Multiple Motor Carriage you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:M13 Multiple Motor Carriage for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Project assessment
B-class for such a short article as Matthew Aylmer, 1st Baron Aylmer seems overly generous; C would be more appropriate in my opinion. ww2censor (talk) 09:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M13 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage
The article M13 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:M13 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Freikorp (talk) 13:25, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Palmer E. Pierce
Hello! Your submission of Palmer E. Pierce at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 22:20, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

GA Cup
Hey Tomandjerry211,

I noticed you started adding reviews/reassessments to your submissions page. Unfortunately, the GA Cup does not start until July 1 and therefore no reviews/reassessments are eligible until then, as mentioned here. If you have any questions, feel free to ask! :) -- Dom497 ( talk ) 22:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that fact, but since I'm a newcomer to the GA cup I (unfortunately) didn't know that. Thanks for reverting my mistaken edits.--Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 22:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries! At least your eager to get started! :D -- Dom497 ( talk ) 22:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Scripts
User:Tomandjerry211/common.js

Assuming this works like mine, red links will show when you click on a page with dodgy references, which you can repair and if you look at the "toolbox" (under the search letterbox) on the left of the article page, there should be "Highlight duplicate links". Click on and they should show up in a red outline. Regards.Keith-264 (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Greetings again, nice to see you've been spreading your wings. I've found a new script importScript('User:Ucucha/duplinks.js'); which highlights mistakes in the references section where the book details are in a template. As a test I tried it on your revision of Mediterranean and Middle East theatre of World War II and found no errors (unlike a lot of the articles I've been working on). RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 09:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Keith-264 (talk) 12:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Mediterranean and Middle East theatre of World War II
Although it doesn't impact the rating, and I suspect this is the result of work by multiple prior editors, there is inconsistency in presenting operation names in the article. No all caps, but some operation names are italicized, while others are not. In one case an operation name is italicized and the word "Operation" is excluded from the link, adding an unnecessary redirect. On a related subject, for German operations, I think the looser translation of Fall as "Operation", rather than the literal translation of "Case" is easier for users with no military history background to understand. Good work. --Lineagegeek (talk) 15:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Archiving
If you archive something, particularly for the first time, please do not use the name "archive1" but instead use "Archive 1" because otherwise many scripts will not be able to display the archive. Also please do not archive at least the 3 most recent conversations on a talk page.

As a general rule there is no need to manually archive a page as you did with Talk:Mediterranean and Middle East theatre of World War II/archive1 Instead go to Help:Archive and simply cut and past the example (with an archive box), to just above the first section, and there will never be a need to manually archive the talk page. -- PBS (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for the advice.--Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 20:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2015

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 12:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Palmer E. Pierce
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:46, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

I need HELP List of Ottoman governors of Baghdad
I need HELP Kurdistantolive (talk) 23:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, can you see List of Safavid governors of Baghdad ,,, Kurdistantolive (talk) 23:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 21 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * On the List of Ottoman governors of Baghdad page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=667952459 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F667952459%7CList of Ottoman governors of Baghdad%5D%5D Ask for help])

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Colorado (BB-45)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Colorado (BB-45) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 00:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Colorado (BB-45)
The article USS Colorado (BB-45) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Colorado (BB-45) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS New Mexico (BB-40)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS New Mexico (BB-40) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 14:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

GA Reassessments
USS Washington (BB-47), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

USS Colorado (BB-45), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

I ask that you please address the issues I have brought up on the two reassessment pages within the next 7 days. Thanks!-- Dom497 ( talk ) 23:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Plagiarism and paraphrasing
To avoid plagiarism, you need to completely rewrite the text. Changing a few words here and there does not cut it - you need to change sentence structure, word choice, etc. Take a look at the changes I made here - that's the scale of work you need to do. Parsecboy (talk) 13:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

GA Cup Reassessment
Hey,

I noticed that you have left an opinion for the GA reassessment of Chef (film). Looks like you got the general idea, however, in the interest of whoever is going to fix the article, can you please provide examples of the where the article fails the criteria. For example, for 3a, rather than saying "I'm not sure about this", provide some examples on why it fails 3a. After you do this, I will be glad to award you the points! :) -- Dom497 ( talk ) 00:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Just so you know, you still haven't added examples. :) -- Dom497 ( talk ) 21:09, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/USS Colorado (BB-45) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Tank Girl at FAC
Hello Tomandjerry211. Just a friendly notice that Tank Girl (film) has been at FAC for a couple weeks now - see here. As you were the GA reviewer, i'd be very happy if you could make some comments there, but don't feel obligated. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 07:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

GA review of Kurt Brändle
Thanks for reviewing and passing the article. Please don't forget to close the review by following these instructions. Thanks MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS New Mexico (BB-40)
The article USS New Mexico (BB-40) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS New Mexico (BB-40) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 12:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much!
Thank you so much for taking the time to review the article Pelvic inflammatory disease and pointing out the ways in which could be improved. Even if the article had not passed the review, I still would be appreciative because I learned so much from your 'method' of the review. As a matter of fact, would you be able to let me know where you got the templates for the review? I have only reviewed one article related to assessing it for GA status, but if I were to be able to use your tools, I think I would be able to help out more. Again thank you. Best Regards,
 *  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 14:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Time and Eternity GA nomination
Hello Tomandjerry211. Firstly thank you very much for taking the time to look at the Time and Eternity. I have tried to address the points you made, I will go through them here: a) I've added a little biography about Stace, which includes a little about the publication history (or the change in topic the book marked in his thought). b) I deleted the citation in the lead, I left the ones in the synopsis as I think they are helpful and I see they are used in The Demands of Liberal Education, which is a 'Good Article' in a similar category. c) Standardized the hyphens and used Template:Cite isbn for guidance. Hope that is ok. d) There aren't many more sources. I have found this: "American writer Arthur Goldwag has said that the phrase "that than which there is no other" that he encountered in Time and Eternity was one of a number of factors that contributed to him giving up praying " What do you think? e) I saw the problem with that image's Fair use rationale so I deleted it along with the quote.
 * Wrong image, meant for the image in the infobox.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:27, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

(I'm trying to think of another image I could replace it with, but unable so far). So, how does that look? Thank you again. --Evenmadderjon (talk) 22:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Ha ha! Restored. I'm not sure why you say the book cover has fair use issues, it seems to be a fairly common licensing arrangement on book covers e.g. Sonslovers.jpg. Could you explain and I'll sort it out. Thank you.--Evenmadderjon (talk) 11:51, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Lacks a response to the "low resolution" question.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 17:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Marvellous. Thanks. According to the best guide I could find Fair use/Definition of "low resolution" (admittedly not excellent), the image meets the low res criteria as it is less than 400 px wide. Over to you on the rest of the issues.--Evenmadderjon (talk) 20:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for judging Time and Eternity (philosophy book) fit for Good Article status, and for your help in improving it.--Evenmadderjon (talk) 08:08, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for USS Colorado (BB-45)
Gatoclass (talk) 02:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

SuggestBot suggestions, user account checking
Hi there! I maintain SuggestBot and noticed you've requested some suggestions. You might be wondering why you haven't gotten any, and that's because we do some checking of which user added the template before sending suggestions, to ensure that users cannot spam each other with a ton of suggestions based on articles one might not be interested in. I noticed you have the appropriate templates set on your alternate account, but we unfortunately don't support that (might do somewhere down the line, as I think it would be neat, but resources are rather limited). So, the easiest way to get suggestions is to add the template with the same account that owns the user/talk page where the suggestions will be posted.

Hope this was helpful, let me know if you have any questions and I'll do my best to help out. And BTW, I'll remove the template for now. Regards, Nettrom (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of T19 Howitzer Motor Carriage
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article T19 Howitzer Motor Carriage you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Capture of Wurst Farm
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Capture of Wurst Farm you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Where are we on this? Can you finish by the end of the month?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:20, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I suggest failing this, so we can fix the issues, and renominating if Keith is OK with it.Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't see this earlier and will do so now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Capture of Wurst Farm
The article Capture of Wurst Farm you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Capture of Wurst Farm for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup - Round 2
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:52, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for USS New Mexico (BB-40)
Materialscientist (talk) 05:52, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Vine Street, London
Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 22:39, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Malvern Hill FAC
Hello Tomandjerry211,

Dropping by to tell you that I've nominated Battle of Malvern Hill for FAC here: Featured article candidates/Battle of Malvern Hill/archive2. You commented at the MILHIST review, I thought you might be interested in dropping a line there. Cheers, --ceradon ( talk •  edits ) 20:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Vine Street, London
Tomandjerry211, an issue has come up with your review of this nomination, and it's preventing the promotion of the hook. Please return as soon as possible to expand on your review. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Joseph Berchtold
Hello: I don't know if you are interested, but I just put this bio article up for GA review. You have done several along the same lines recently and thought you may want to take a crack at it. If not, it can wait. Thanks, Kierzek (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for the review and enjoy your break. Kierzek (talk) 21:34, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Quang Tri (1968)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Quang Tri (1968) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Quang Tri (1968)
The article Battle of Quang Tri (1968) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Battle of Quang Tri (1968) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 20:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M21 Mortar Motor Carriage
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article M21 Mortar Motor Carriage you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 01:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 01:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage
The article M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 01:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage
The article M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 20:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS West Virginia (BB-48)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS West Virginia (BB-48) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 18:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M21 Mortar Motor Carriage
The article M21 Mortar Motor Carriage you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:M21 Mortar Motor Carriage for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 23:01, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M21 Mortar Motor Carriage
The article M21 Mortar Motor Carriage you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:M21 Mortar Motor Carriage for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 12:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of M17 Half track for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M17 Half track is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/M17 Half track until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited USS West Virginia (BB-48), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pillbox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Tomandjerry211. I'm just posting to let you know that List of United States Army campaigns during World War II – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 25. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Institute for advanced studies in information and communication technology
Hello Tomandjerry211,

Could you please explain why you asked for deletion of "Institute for advanced studies in information and communication technology" wikipage? You said that is promotional, but I don't understand why. Could you please tell me where the errors are? (please refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MATTEO_ARAGONE/sandbox) It seems to me that I've written it in a quite neutral way. ISICT is a well know Italian Institute, similar Institutes have their Wikipage (European_College_of_Parma, Scuola_superiore_di_Catania) similar to the one that I created). Please also note that this page was a translation.

Thanks in advance for your explanation, Matteo Aragone
 * Response:
 * First of all a Wikipedia article is not an info website, so the article should have been rewritten to include only necessary information for regular reader.
 * Next, "student average score is 27/30 and no student's score below 24/30". Exceptional claims require multiple exceptional sources. Currently there are no sources for that point.
 * Level two headers (two equal signs around the text in the header) are used for section headers, not level one.
 * "Benefits" section seems non neutral.


 * I also have a question: "Where was its was translated from?". Thanks, Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:25, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of T19 Howitzer Motor Carriage
The article T19 Howitzer Motor Carriage you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:T19 Howitzer Motor Carriage for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M9 Half-track
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article M9 Half-track you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 14:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M9 Half-track
The article M9 Half-track you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:M9 Half-track for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 14:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M9 Half-track
The article M9 Half-track you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:M9 Half-track for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 02:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:2014 Continental Cup of Curling/GA2
Tomandjerry211, you posted to the linked review page that you were failing this nomination, but it's still showing up as active on the article's talk page. If you did mean to fail it immediately, can you please finish the process? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Careful
Don't tag articles for deletion based on BLP if they're about fictional characters. DS (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the article seemed confusing. Thanks for the notification, Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 21:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for taking up Vernon Jones GA review
Thank you for taking up a GA review for the Vernon Jones article. I look forward to reading your report and fixing any issues found. Carl Henderson (talk) 21:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the GA review. I'm working on fixing the issues you found, and hope to have them all fixed by end of the weekend! Carl Henderson (talk) 02:54, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: Summer 2015

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) delivered on behalf of Imzadi1979 05:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carp-Talk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Xuanwu Gate Incident GA nomination
Could you re-open the Talk:Xuanwu Gate Incident GA nomination? I wasn't active last week, so I didn't have time to respond to your review. I'll fix the article within the next few days in order to address your concerns.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 03:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I'll come back to it as soon you fix the issues.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 10:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)