User talk:Tomas.jefferson

Speedy deletion nomination of Kiwibeak


A tag has been placed on Kiwibeak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 20:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * You need to follow Wikipedia's rules if you want to submit an article. You have not followed our guidelines. If you really wish to contribute to Wikipedia, then you need to start slowly. Almost all articles by new editors are deleted instantly, not out of some deep-seated bigotry, but because they aren't good enough. I've been on Wikipedia for nine months and I still haven't created my first article. We are not trying to drive you away. We're trying to keep Wikipedia good. You say there is a child actor with "no notable credits" on Wikipedia. Really? Who? If it isn't okay, I'll submit that for deletion. However, you provided no references and no basis for notability. It read like an advert for an obscure site. I'm sorry for being so brutally honest, it's a habit, but I feel it's better to lay it all out front rather than to sugarcoat it and let someone continue making mistakes that reflect badly on them. -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 01:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm *Treker. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 06:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)



You claim a neutral point of view. Well, why are you reverting and allowing others to publish cleared bias specualtive strong statements that carry overt political points-of-view, promotion of ideas? Because there are facts and non-essential non-facts. One such example is the prominent highlight inclusion and statement that Casimir Pulaski was intersex, when this is not a fact. As the documentation already states, there is not actual fact of his gender, and certainly his identity was male. This is a fact. He was raised, male. Identified obviously as male. And as far as the facts show died male, with only recent controversy (allied with current POLITICS) over DNA study for a body of maternal relative found in an unmarked grave correlation with testing mtDNA for it with a supposed grandniece. Nevermind the pre-existing historical documents claiming his burial-at-sea, or that the study and direct statements from actual researchers from the last study were "SPECULATIVE" - it is not fact, but "may be."

So when you push and revert, re-instate this statement on this article, it is absolutely not neutral. There is not hard fact at all that he was intersex, or female, etc. Treker and I noted some others are spreading and promoting misinformation - probably the most unethical (unfit for editorship) and evil thing you can do. You are not taking editing responsibility seriously unless you are biased and intent on spreading speculation and your own pespective over fact, and this proves it.

December 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Casimir Pulaski has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Casimir Pulaski was changed by Tomas.jefferson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952596 on 2020-12-05T17:50:26+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Casimir Pulaski. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Casimir Pulaski, you may be blocked from editing. ...GELongstreet (talk) 18:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)