User talk:Tomas Gilbfarb

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article John Francis Hemenway, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  21:25, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to John Francis Hemenway. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  22:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Uncle Milty. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  WAYNE  OLAJUWON 23:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Uncle Milty.  WAYNE  OLAJUWON 23:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Tebson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pol430 (talk) 23:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. I'm willing to assume good faith that you are not vandalizing, however the article you created appears to be based on false sources (I could not find any of the authors who wrote the cited references). Can you please explain your edits? Dabomb87 (talk) 23:26, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Tomas Gilbfarb for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I'll respond to that after I'm unblocked. Thank you. Tomas Gilbfarb (talk) 22:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users for a period of 48 hours. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  01:40, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

This is your only warning. If you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Wayne Olajuwon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''It's inadvisable to come straight off a block and attack another editor. Permanent blocking can be arranged, if you prefer. Rodhull andemu  01:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)''  Rodhull  andemu  01:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand how I personally attacked anyone. Can you please refer me to the specific statement? Tomas Gilbfarb (talk) 01:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * .  Eagles   24/7  (C)  01:43, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Eagles. Tomas Gilbfarb (talk) 01:43, 27 November 2010 (UTC)


 * You know full well what you posted to User talk:Wayne Olajuwon; it's in your history. But given that another admin has blocked you for a short time on the basis of similar attacks, I see no reason not to uprate your block to indefinite since you are not getting the point. Ask for unblock if you like, but recently unblocked editors should surely realise that their behaviour will be under particular scrutiny, and in that regard, you have only yourself to blame. Rodhull  andemu  01:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Here. Others might tolerate that kind of abuse; I won't. Rodhull  andemu  01:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Me neither.  WAYNE  OLAJUWON 01:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * To the reviewing admin: please also see Sockpuppet investigations/Tomas Gilbfarb for socking concerns from this users as well as the personal attacks.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  01:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Tomas Gilbfarb for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Wuh Wuz  Dat  17:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)