User talk:Tomasthetankengine

I refer you to Sock_puppetry/Notes_for_the_suspect -
 * "If the accuser has listed evidence against you, you are not allowed to remove the notice from your page for ten days. You are allowed to respond to each and every accusation on the evidence page but are not allowed to remove accusations."

I have listed evidence against you, therefore you may not remove this notice. Dibo T 04:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

please just stop
Please stop putting your rubbish on my talk page. We both know who you are and in the past you have had the fact tag explained to you again and again. Just stop.Tancred 13:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

If a user wants to remove warnings and comments from their talk page, there is no policy that says that they can't. --Onorem♠Dil 18:09, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * While a suspected sockpuppet discussion is ongoing, the tag should remain...although it should be on your user page instead of your talk page. --Onorem♠Dil 18:22, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Fact tags
Please stop putting fact tags all through the pages commonly edited by people you don't like. It's disruptive. Imagine if everyone were to do it. The place would be a complete mess. Please stop it. Dibo T 01:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * If I were to go through every single page you've edited and do the same thing, I would almost certainly send Smackbot into meltdown doing the tag maintenance. Not every single sentence needs a source. Should we smack fact tags on the Earth page, where the first sentence reads 'Earth (IPA: /ɜ(ɹ)θ/) is the third planet from the Sun and is the largest of the terrestrial planets in the Solar System, in both diameter and mass.'?
 * Your tagging is simply stupid and disruptive. It's notable that the only places you're doing it are pages that Tancred or I have edited. Consider this diff - I mean that's nothing but seeking to disrupt. It's exactly what you were blocked for before. Don't be a dick. Dibo T 04:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Tancred's user page
He is allowed to remove user warnings from his page. Take that as confirmation that he's read them. However, given the spurious nature of the supposed offences (stemming as they do from your own disruptive editing), don't be all that surprised if any attempt to block him is met with refusal. Dibo T 01:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)