User talk:Tomasz1973

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Tomasz1973. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Tomasz Misiak, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 14:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tomasz Misiak, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 15:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The article about Tomasz Misiak is primarily based on allegations stemming from a marital conflict. The links and references justifying the claims in the article are sourced from press materials inspired by or constructed within this conflict. The person creating this material uses it for defaming my person and has lost legal cases as a result, even being sentenced to criminal charges for her actions. The quoted press materials are selective and mostly belong to the so-called government media of the Law and Justice regime, which has politically abused the prosecutor's office in Poland. This matter may end up in court because Wikipedia is being used for further defamation of my person. This material has little to do with real facts and is a compilation of opinions and legal events presented from a one-sided perspective. Please provide instructions on how to make the necessary corrections to such content before I involve a law firm." Tomasz1973 (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Below are sources showing how situation is in reality which has been removed by You
 * https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/byly-senator-po-bedzie-podwazac-zeznania-zony-co-dalej-z-glosnym-sledztwem-6951748968639424a
 * https://www.onet.pl/informacje/onetwiadomosci/kulisy-zatrzymania-bylego-senatora-w-tle-wojna-malzonkow/wrbqz0k,79cfc278
 * https://www.pb.pl/wojna-o-wizowy-kontrakt-trwa-1135578
 * https://www.newsweek.pl/polska/misiak-pozwal-rzeczpospolita-sprawa-misiaka-opisana-przez-rz/gqnwjn6
 * https://polityka.se.pl/wiadomosci/zona-musi-przeprosic-senatora-misiaka-nie-wolno-jej-podawac-informowac-o-zyciu-rodzinnym-aa-hEWF-VBz6-8eWY.html
 * All of this are free idependent media on the contrary to movement related media used in current arcticle version Tomasz1973 (talk) 16:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard‎ could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 16:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)


 * OK thank You for information, as my comments were removed as "conflict of interest" in case I supported them with reliable media coverage. I don't know who removed initial wikipedia content but current one is full of manipulation, non democratic government media, repeating accuses which I won I court and and people who were doing it were sentence under criminal code for defamation. What I can do in such situation. Tomasz1973 (talk) 00:41, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Let me clarify: this is all a game. Those of us playing the game will kick you out if you threaten legal action. Either win the argument here or leave. Because you are the subject of the article, you should not be editing it, at all. This is our slam book and we get to say mean things if we want to. If you want to argue that what the article says should be changed discuss it on the talk page. Again, none of this courtroom intonation stuff. If you take issue with the sources used bring it to WP:RSN. Not all news sources are reliable and it's a fair argument if you think sources shouldn't be allowed on some topics. That said, if you don't like your state media you are probably out of luck; Wikipedia likes state media because it has the veneer of respectability. I hope this makes sense to you, as you're vainly upset about your public image. Please pray the Litany of humility. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:54, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 15:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The article about Tomasz Misiak is primarily based on allegations stemming from a marital conflict. The links and references justifying the claims in the article are sourced from press materials inspired by or constructed within this conflict. The person creating this material uses it for defaming my person and has lost legal cases as a result, even being sentenced to criminal charges for her actions. The quoted press materials are selective and mostly belong to the so-called government media of the Law and Justice regime, which has politically abused the prosecutor's office in Poland. This matter may end up in court because Wikipedia is being used for further defamation of my person. This material has little to do with real facts and is a compilation of opinions and legal events presented from a one-sided perspective. Please provide instructions on how to make the necessary corrections to such content before I involve a law firm." Tomasz1973 (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 * Below are sources showing how situation is in reality which has been removed by You
 * https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/byly-senator-po-bedzie-podwazac-zeznania-zony-co-dalej-z-glosnym-sledztwem-6951748968639424a
 * https://www.onet.pl/informacje/onetwiadomosci/kulisy-zatrzymania-bylego-senatora-w-tle-wojna-malzonkow/wrbqz0k,79cfc278
 * https://www.pb.pl/wojna-o-wizowy-kontrakt-trwa-1135578
 * https://www.newsweek.pl/polska/misiak-pozwal-rzeczpospolita-sprawa-misiaka-opisana-przez-rz/gqnwjn6
 * https://polityka.se.pl/wiadomosci/zona-musi-przeprosic-senatora-misiaka-nie-wolno-jej-podawac-informowac-o-zyciu-rodzinnym-aa-hEWF-VBz6-8eWY.html
 * All of this are free idependent media on the contrary to movement related media used in current arcticle version Tomasz1973 (talk) 16:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC) Tomasz1973 (talk) 16:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  00:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)