User talk:Tombo671

Modifying talk pages
Hi, if you want to start a new discussion on talk pages, please click on the "New section" button at the top of the screen. Please do don't delete other discussions already on the pages, thank you. Mattg82 (talk) 15:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

List of best-selling music artists
Please refrain from moving artists upwards on the list without providing a clear explanation at the Talk:List of best-selling music artists. Make sure you discuss the reliability of your sources before you edit the List of best-selling music artists. All sources must be highly reliable and the sales figures within must be supported by enough certified sales. The required percentages are posted at the top of Talk:List of best-selling music artists.--Harout72 (talk) 02:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Images at List of best-selling music artists
Please refrain from adding anymore images than we already have at List of best-selling music artists. We are to have seven images only, and they have to be by the top certified artists. The instructions for that is posted in each section. See the third line below images: Sections are to include maximum of seven images of the top certified artists/bands. Be advised that further similar edits will constitute disruptive editing.--Harout72 (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Your source nothing writes about it
Your source nothing writes about it. Please give a new source. Subtropical-man (talk) 14:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

What are you doing?
You've created a bit of a mess here. If you're unsure about moving/splitting articles then I really suggest you read some style guidelines or talk to other editors first. I also do not see a recent discussion pertaining to splitting this up, which you probably should have done first. You've created a bunch of redirects and double-redirects and you've incorrectly capitalized the word "Albums" in the article's title. You also did not move any of the categories over. If you're going to take the reins and do something this extensive then it's best if you do it in a way that does not require others to clean up after you. This all needs to be corrected and I would even suggest merging them back together until a new consensus is reached to split. - eo (talk) 12:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Janet Jackson discography
 * Janet Jackson singles discography
 * Janet jackson ALLbums Discgography (please remove mods)
 * Janet jackson albums Discgography
 * Janet jackson albums discography
 * Janet Jackson Albums discography
 * No worries. For now I've merged things back so that a new discussion can start and/or someone can add to the last split talk, which I see was last January, per the talk page.  I'd suggest/encourage you to re-open the topic.  I deleted the test pages and I kept your IRL additions that you did before the split.  If this is going to be split then I think we all want it to be done correctly. - eo (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Janet Discography
Both look fine, but none of the chart positions are sourced, and still need tweaking. Like i said on the talk page, my procrastination is playing a big role in my failure to work on them but Mine are practically done. What I'll do is pretty much finish mine and submit them, mine have sourcing. — Gabe 19  ( talk contribs) 21:54, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I submitted and saved what I have so far at User:Gabe19/Janet Jackson singles discography and User:Gabe19/Janet Jackson albums discography. I still need to work on the singles intro section, but mine are sourced, (correctly as well I believe) and should be looked over for mistakes and what not. —  Gabe 19  ( talk contribs) 22:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * To be honest, (not a jerk) but mine are more complete, even though more works needs to be done. All of my chart peaks have sourcing and are complete. (to my knowledge) and sources such as this are not reliable for FA. and this is a dead one.  —  Gabe 19  ( talk contribs) 14:38, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Another thing, where are you getting most of your peak positions? with this edit, you say it peaked at #6 in Australia, when in fact it never charted according to their official site. Same with this edit where you changed the peak positions, but not according to source 1 and 2. —  Gabe 19  ( talk contribs) 06:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Your welcome to email it to me, santististevangabriel@yahoo.com. Because we would have to add it as a source to the page. And what about the Canada peaks you added? I remember searching extensively through their database for her album/single peaks. —  Gabe 19  ( talk contribs) 12:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Janet Jackson discography
Could you explain why you have inserted No.10 for Australia for "Got 'til It's Gone" and supported it with Switzerland's Hitparade which doesn't support it? You have also inserted No.11 for France and No.17 for Germany in your next edit using the same exact source which again doesn't support those positions for "Got 'til It's Gone".--Harout72 (talk) 15:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I inserted the No.10 for Australia, No.11 for France, No.17 for Germany using the source you provided on my talk-page.
 * I have removed your recent insertions of Japan certifications except for one. The one for Janet Jackson's Rhythm Nation 1814 cannot be found, and the Oricon page for Janet and All for You doesn't support certifications, it supports charts position. Let me know if I'm mistaken.
 * I don't believe we need to split the page into two as it's nomally done with those artists with huge catalogs.--Harout72 (talk) 15:35, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567086967 your edit] to Simply the Best (Tina Turner album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * | note9          = Live, London 1986    Alternate version
 * Certification Table Entry|region=Australia|type=album|title=Simply the Best|artist=Tina Turner|

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=603267219 your edit] to Rihanna discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:55, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * {cite web | url=http://ariacharts.com.au/chart/singles | title=ARIA Albums Chart | publisher=[ARIA] | accessdate=December 9, 2013}}
 * {cite web | url=http://ariacharts.com.au/chart/singles | title=ARIA Albums Chart | publisher=[ARIA] | accessdate=Febuary, 2014}}

Falsifying sources
I see that you were prevented from adding a reference to top100.blogspot.com.au, and you then added the material anyway, falsely claiming that the information was found in another source. Do not do that: the filters are in place to prevent the addition of poorly-sourced material. If you bypass the filter by including false sources again, you will be blocked from editing.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Idiot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited That's the Way Love Goes (Janet Jackson song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Together Again (Janet Jackson song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Janet Jackson
An article that you have been involved in editing, Janet Jackson, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. wia (talk) 23:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)