User talk:Tombomba2

A tag has been placed on CameraLabs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:CameraLabs. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Charles 21:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

An answer to your question about why CameraLabs gets flagged for deletion when other sites do not: One reason, I would say, is that this page reads like an advertisement for CameraLabs. Other possible reasons might be that Digital Photography Review is much more well known or popular. If you are the owner of CameraLabs, it would probably be better to wait until someone else writes about website. If you are not, perhaps a careful rewriting of the article might help. -Everyguy 21:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Digital Photography Review
Thanks for bringing this page to my attention. I have added a proposal for deletion to the article. If it is contested then I will open an article for deletion debate for it. Regards LittleOldMe 21:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Gordon Laing with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Gordon Laing with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Gordon Laing saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq 11:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)