User talk:Tomcat7/2012/November

GA nomination of Johann Peter Hebel
Hello! I wanted to make sure that you were aware the the GA review of Johann Peter Hebel was placed "on hold" pending some changes that need to be made. I'm sorry I forgot to notify you about it before. Don't worry, I'm far from a stickler on the 7-day hold rule. Take the time you need. I see you have other GA noms to handle (including Poor Folk, which I was surprised to find is also your nom. Don't worry, take the time you need to do a good job on that one). I'm sure it is frustrating to have several outstanding noms sit for months (I was so sorry to see that you been waiting since June for this one!) and then suddenly they all get reviewed at once. Just let me know if you are still interested in continuing with this one. Sometimes GA monitors complain to me when they see I have an article on hold and there has been no activity on the talk page for more than a week. So, I just want to be sure of where things stand. Happy editing! -- Tea with toast  (話)  04:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Ortrun Enderlein
Hi, Great Orange Pumpkin / Tomcat7, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Done - I sub-divided divided the 'Sports career' section, which was rather large. What are "Ehrenpreis" and Goldene Ehrennadel (retirement)? I gather they are some sort of award, but an approximate translation would be useful. :-) Good luck with your next GA nomination. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 October newsletter
The 2012 WikiCup has come to a close; congratulations to, our 2012 champion! Cwmhiraeth joins our exclusive club of previous winners: (2007),  (2008),  (2009),  (2010) and  (2011). Our final standings were as follows:



Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.


 * The featured article award goes to, for four featured articles in the final round.
 * The good article award also goes to, for 19 good articles in the second round.
 * The list award goes to, for three featured lists in the final round.
 * The topic award goes to, for three good topics (with around 40 articles) in round 4.
 * The did you know award goes to, for well over 100 DYKs in the final round.
 * The news award goes to, for 10 in the news items in round 3.
 * The picture award goes to, for two featured pictures in round 2.
 * The reviewer award goes to both (14 reviews in round 1) and  (14 reviews in round 3).
 * Finally, for achieving an incredible bonus point total in the final round, and for bringing the top-importance article frog to featured status, a biostar has been awarded to.

Awards will be handed out in the coming days; please bear with us! This year's competition also saw fantastic contributions in all rounds, from newer Wikipedians contributing their first good or featured articles, right up to highly experienced Wikipedians chasing high scores and contributing to topics outside of their usual comfort zones. It would be impossible to name all of the participants who have achieved things to be proud of, but well done to all of you, and thanks! Wikipedia has certainly benefited from the work of this year's WikiCup participants.

Next year's WikiCup will begin in January. Currently, discussions and polls are open, and all contributions are welcome. You can also sign up for next year's competition. There will be no further newsletters this year, although brief notes may be sent out in December to remind everyone about the upcoming competition. It's been a pleasure to work with you all, and we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:27, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

List of unusual units of measurement: light-distance typo
Wow, that was fast! Thanks. Kendall-K1 (talk) 20:43, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. Hope there was no edit conflict ;). Regards.--Tomcat (7) 12:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

(Yet another) Harrison GA review?
Hi GOP/Tomcat7. I realise you're probably busy enough as it is, but if you have the time (not to mention the inclination), I've got a few more George Harrison articles up as GANs. "Wah-Wah" is the first in the queue of Harrison song articles and there's also The Concert for Bangladesh (the event, not the album, which you kindly reviewed a while back). I understand if you're otherwise detained – just thought I'd get in touch anyway. (And I've just noticed you've now done 154 reviews ... wow, what a contribution.) Best, JG66 (talk) 02:49, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, will probably review in the next week. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 12:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Cheer up: Halloween is coming!
Sorry you're feeling glum. It is challenging to forge a consensus, sometimes, as everyone has their own opinions. But sometimes it is very satisfying, and people learn to respect each other, and even learn a lot from each other. I am currently enjoying the editorial process on such articles as Joseph Grimaldi, which is finishing a peer review. After more than 6 years, I still feel happy to be helping to improve this free encyclopedia. Meanwhile, if you have any time to spare, I look forward to your further comments on the GA review for Jackie Evancho. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your review and excellent comments. Will you put the little green X on the article, or does it happen automatically?  All the best, and Happy Editing!  -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:58, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The bot does it. I previously did it manually. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 21:02, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Dog
barking soon, a good match to the Osiris myth, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:05, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Abel Prize at WP:FLC
You have a number of outstanding comments there. If you don't think you will address them, please let me know so I can archive the nomination. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:38, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I will begin tomorrow. Thanks for the reminder. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 18:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Nudge. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar
You're very kind, but I don't think it's false modesty to disclaim expertise, I just have a lot of bird books  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you, Kind Sir, re Earl Hines. But it's Hines who was so great - not me!Tolesi (talk) 14:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Dostoyevsky article
Hello, Tomcat7,

Although the article hasn't got any templates regarding subediting, I'll lay my hands on it. Sadly, can't contribute with any information as I'm nothing but a fan of his work –but at least they won't pick you up on a piss-poor prose. Regards, --Cocolacoste (talk) 03:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry to pester you, but I'm having trouble with this ambiguous sentence "Officially, Dostoyevsky's father died of an apoplectic stroke, but a peasant, Pavel Khotiaintsev, claimed he was killed by other peasants; however, the truth of Khotiaintsev's claims could not be verified because if they were true, he would inherit more land". Who(m) does the last "he" refer to? Dostoyevsky (as I reckon) or Pavel? The sentence needs rewording, though it'd be in different ways according to the meaning.
 * I'd be glad if you could help.
 * Btw, I've read somewhere else that the story was made up by a landord, not a peasant. Is this so?
 * Cheers, --Cocolacoste (talk) 10:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi again, TomCat
 * I saw the changes you've made to D. article just now. There are some problems with the sentence structure:


 * "French-educating boarding school" isn't clear. From what I've read in The seeds... (p.54) the lads were sent to a day school – not boarding – founded by a certain Souchard (of French origin or French himself, I gather?) because their dad wanted them to learn the "prestigious" Romance lang. As for the p. 9 from A Writer's Life on Google books, I can access only to a teensy-weensy bit in which there's nothing about said school.  Is The New Testament Selected for Children written in French?  They had to learn it by heart at school? If so, I'd write summat like "They were sent to a day school founded by a French lang. tutor blah, blah"
 * "Mikhail was refused admission on account of his poor health and the school's better studying positions, and was later sent to the Academy in Reval, Estonia. The two brothers had to break up". Again, "studying positions" isn't a collocation in Eng, the comma's misplaced – they’re not independent clauses – and, IMO, the whole thing reads better, less abrupt, with the sentence connector "so".
 * Linguistic-y things aside, Frank just mentions that Mikhail was refused because of his health, not that he failed his entrance exams (p. 74). And so does Kjetsia on p. 23 (can't get into  pp. 35-67 on Google bloody books)  What exactly d'you wanna say?  That the academy in Reval was less renowned or prestigious?
 * I'm hugely impressed by the toil you've put into that article and really want to help you. Let me know what you reckon on all I said. And please feel free to pull me on if I've altered the meaning of  a paragraph or section.
 * Looking forward to a reply, at least one saying where I can shove all these comments up.
 * Best,--Cocolacoste (talk) 18:50, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * With all due respect, you are talking to me like I was a pupil. Phrases as "What exactly d'you wanna say?" are a good example of what I reject. --Tomcat (7) 11:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

No, TomCat, I'm not the patronising type. I asked what you wanted to say simply because that info doesn't appear in the books by F. and K. and I was confused – especially after reading in one of them, can't remember which one, that the academy M. went to was in fact less prestigious. Now, if you'd rather I stopped copy-editing the article, just let me know and I'll tell the people at GOCE I'm not involved in the project any more.

My comments on your work, if useless, were honest. Best,--Cocolacoste (talk) 23:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * When I first read above I thought the "useless and deceitful" were part of the original post but seems I'm wrong, hence the advice per WP:TPO: Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page. Striking text constitutes a change in meaning, and should only be done by the user who wrote it or someone acting at their explicit request.. Truthkeeper (talk) 21:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Beit al Quran GA nomination
Hi, I did the edits as per your recommendations. The review has been inactive for some time now, though. Hope you can review it when it's convenient for you. Cheers! --Droodkin (talk) 09:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, replied. Now what?--Droodkin (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It's been a week or so since the review has been edited. Have you finished reviewing? --Droodkin (talk) 12:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Got a new source! Should be good now. --Droodkin (talk) 14:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

List of Canada's Wonderland attractions
I fixed two of the three issues you mentioned on the review page. For the second point you made, I have to ask 'why?'.--Dom497 (talk) 19:28, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Done
Another one done. Keep up the good work! (I removed the template as I couldn't in good conscience pass as a GA an article that I felt didn't meet the criteria; what happens to the article after the review, of course, is another matter.... ;-) )  SilkTork   ✔Tea time  09:46, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lego-Brücke
Hello! Your submission of Lego-Brücke at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! dragfyre_ ʞןɐʇ c 14:47, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Tomcat, I've added a review of Klauser Schuhe onto the nomination page for Lego-Brücke. Sorry for the wait! There are a couple of concerns I've identified, including the need for a copy edit and a rewrite of the first paragraph of the article. Once these are done, the article should be good to go onto the main page. --dragfyre_ ʞןɐʇ c 14:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Abuwtiyuw
Hello. I've raised an issue in this section of the article talk page, and I would like it to be resolved before Abuwtiyuw runs on the main page. A. Parrot (talk) 02:41, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree. The source is not very reliable, does not fully support the statement and the sentence oddly worded. I will remove it. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 09:41, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:44, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

MIGA GA Review
Greetings Tomcat7, I have made some edits per your suggestions on the GA review for Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. John Shandy`  &bull; talk 21:43, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring
Could you check my reply? I feel you may have misunderstood what the vote is actually about. J Milburn (talk) 17:47, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Pushkin
Out of interest, what was WP:SEE supposed to link to? I'm guessing you weren't aiming for the South East of England portal. Thanks Span (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:YOU would be a better link. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 20:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 12:23, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Belgium), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Albert II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

JSTOR
Hi there. You're one of the first 100 people to sign up for a free JSTOR account via the requests page. We're ready to start handing out accounts, if you'd still like one.

JSTOR will provide you access via an email invitation, so to get your account, please email me (swalling@undefinedwikimedia.org) with...


 * the subject line "JSTOR"
 * your English Wikipedia username
 * your preferred email address for a JSTOR account

The above information will be given to JSTOR to provide you with your account, but will otherwise remain private. Please do so by November 30th or drop me a message to say you don't want/need an account any longer. If you don't meet that deadline, we will assume you have lost interest, and will provide an account to the next person in the rather long waitlist.

Thank you! Steven Walling (WMF) &bull; talk   21:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 01:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lego-Brücke
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Klauser Schuhe
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fyodor Dostoyevsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sketch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!
As I just posted on my talk page, I just came back from two days off and the expert award was a great surprise, thank you! My main goal in editing Wikipedia is to build content that will last. I'll continue doing that in the future, hoping that WP will keep improving as a reputable source of information on Chinese history. This barnstar will give me extra motivation. Cheers and thank you again! Madalibi (talk) 13:17, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

RE:November 2012
Hi. I'm sorry, but what was the point of leaving this message on my talk page? I never claimed that I own an article, and have no I idea why you think I do. Hehe. --Khanassassin ☪ 14:14, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Your behaviour suggests the complete opposite of what you wrote here. Please read the ANI entry, where you falsely claimed that one user was vandalizing a page and which was redundant and childish, for more information. The point was to inform you, and of course you never claimed that you own an article. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 14:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The claim that I made about the user being a vandal was reasnoable, as even reliable sources said that she wasn't the Nico voice actress. However, Cecil confirmed that she is, so I added the information that she added back. Sorry, but your message was useless. --Khanassassin ☪ 14:59, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It was no way reasonable. What she did was adding a piece of information that showed no signs of vandalism, yet you are claiming the opposite. Your comment is self-contradictory by the way. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 15:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Once, I saw a user edit the Charles Cecil article, and added a sentense which says: " Elisa Carrio said Charles is looking forward to play asylum from senscape, forged by Agustín Cordes." It might not seem like vandalism, but it is. It says thhat an older Argentinian president said that Charles was looking forward to play some game by some other guy. It's not true, highly unlikely, and doesn't have a source. Just like what this user did. Added something about an actress and her daughter playing the characters, and her brother directing. Now, there is not a credit of this woman in the Credits, IMDb and fans of the series and reliable sources say it's another actress, and this makes it highly unlikely and most likely not true. Now do you understand? --Khanassassin ☪ 17:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I should not understand anything, you must understand your attitude towards new users. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 19:18, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * This is the only time I ever "accused" a new user "badly", and it was an understandable mistake. Anyway, we should just stop this, it'll do no good. --Khanassassin ☪ 19:48, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
For your barnstar and for being willing to help out with the Whorf GA review if anyone ever decides to review it. The outcome of the previous review may be discouraging some people from taking up the review - I was very saddened by the review, but I didn't consider the reviewers critique to be fair, and I basically think he failed it on WP:IDONTLIKEIT. If you wish perhaps you could review it instead? I am, as you see, not quite retired.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 18:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I am not much into large articles but I could reconsider. Anyway, now as you are active I will remove the note :). Regards.--Tomcat (7) 18:30, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, "active" may be overstating it. I will be trying to keep a very low profile. If a reviewer shows up and it is not you I would definitely appreciate your help in lifting the workload.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 18:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * When I finish reviewing the remaining articles, and nobody picks this article, I will review it. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 16:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry About That
I was just messing around. Won't happen again :[ (IHAVEtoeditthisarticle (talk) 20:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC))

George Alexandrou and St. Andrew history
Please read this: http://www.roadtoemmaus.net/back_issue_articles/RTE_19/The_Astonishing_Missionary_Journeys.pdf

Alexandrou wrote about St. Andrews life in Dacia (pages 43-45) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.73.168.22 (talk) 12:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Wah-Wah (song) GAR
Hi Tomcat7. Thank you for taking the time to review this one. I've replied to your comments on the talk page and, as you'll see, I'd be grateful for any specifics you might be able to add regarding that first point you raised – about the relevance of the background information I put in the article. I've tried to put a case (so to speak) for both that long Background section and the description of Robert Rodriguez; would you be able to reply to those comments perhaps, when you have a moment? Obviously I'm hoping that my arguments might affect your suggestions ... but hey, quite possibly not(!). Thanks again. Regards, JG66 (talk) 04:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi again. Just to let you know, I've replied to your recent replies. Had a go at that overlong (you were right) Background section, but I really can't see a way to do without most of the info and still provide an in-depth article on a song with so many points of notability. I hope by cutting the section back at least, the article meets GA standards now, but no hard feelings if you disagree. Cheers, JG66 (talk) 10:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Tomcat7. Thanks so much for the pass on this article, I'm really pleased it got their in the end. Like I said on the talk page, your getting me to rethink that opening section has made a huge improvement – the more I pulled out, the more focused it became. Thanks again! Cheers, JG66 (talk) 14:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

GAR
Unfortunately, I'm too busy at this time. Sorry. SJ (talk) 17:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Frida
Please revisit your straight oppose at this WP:FLC which has been worked on quite a lot since your objection. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:12, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive

 * Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify, 22:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poor Folk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

The thin man
Not an expert in musical interpretation, by any means, but the context suggests stripped-down & economical, rather than short-lived. You disagree? TREKphiler  any time you're ready, Uhura  22:16, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "White Terror". Thank you! EarwigBot  operator /  talk  22:47, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:20, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Otis Redding.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Otis Redding.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)