User talk:Tomd.dds

January 2011
Sorry, but your edit in Oscillococcinum reads like advertisement and unabashed promotion. It also distorts scientific consensus on water memory and on the efficacy of Oscillococcinum. Wikipedia is supposed to write neutral articles that reflect mainstream view of science. As such, your edits are plain not acceptable. --Enric Naval (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Using sock puppets to edit war
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Oscillococcinum. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Brangifer (talk) 02:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)