User talk:Tomdozier

Misophonia
Hi Tom. Whilst we appreciate the input of subject experts to Wikipedia articles, can I ask you to please refrain from adding links to your own papers and website to the Misophonia article? The Wikipedia community frowns heavily on such actions, due to the perceived conflict of interest with Wikipedia that results. You are, however, very welcome to suggest additions of this sort on the article's talkpage (prefacing your messages there with the code  will generate a template that will draw other editor's attention, so that they can assess whether or not the addition is suitable). I'd also recommend that you take a few moments to read the essay WP:EXPERT, which has some useful advice for editors like yourself. Regards, Yunshui 雲 水 15:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, this edit is unacceptable, and not in line with our Conflict of interest guideline, which you clearly have not read. Do not attempt to promote yourself or your website again. If you want to propose a link or a reference that you are associated with, do so on the article talk page. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

misophonie
Hi tom, i wanted just to say, you could add informations but never citing sources from your business or your studies. Your could add sources from this webcite http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=misophonia ; but don't mix with sources of your business. Moreover your studies seems not to be on ncbi http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=misophonia+dozier Vatadoshufrench 17:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
You were given ample warning, but you failed to heed it. Therefore: You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)