User talk:Tomeepa

April 2011
Hello. Please refrain from adding trivial lists, as well as un-sourced content, as you've been doing with Mafioso rap. Failure to comply will result in involvement with Wikipedia administratives. Thank you. --Blastmaster11 (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Mafioso rap
Hi, you appear to be partaking in an edit war on the article Mafioso rap. Blastmaster11 has removed that list since it is completely unsourced. I just tried to source a few of the names in that list and failed, so I tend to agree that this was the right move. If you want to add back a list of names to that article since you believe it is encylopedic and improves the article, please make sure that each and every names comes with a footnote pointing at a reliable source confirming it. I'd also like you to have a look at one of the guiding editing principles here on Wikipedia called "Bold, Revert, Discuss"; this is a collaborative project, and we can only get anywhere by working together. Persistence won't get you anywhere and your changes will just be removed, you need to convince people that your changes are beneficial. If you want to discuss this, it may be best to do so on Talk:Mafioso rap, I'll keep that page watchlisted. Thank you, Amalthea  20:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Yo, Blastmaster11. I don't speak English. But, Mafioso rap ＝　East coast Gangsta rap Therefore, All East coast Thug style rapper is Mafioso rapper. They quote from a many Crime films, and are using the name of Gangster of real existence and the Imaginary character as an Alias. Yu know? ─Tomeepa


 * Not quite. Just because a rapper is from the East coast region and has "thug" content in their lyrics, does not necessarily make them Mafioso. There's a pretty big difference between the street/thug rapper and the lavish/classy one. Many of the artists you have listed in the section aren't exactly "notable", being that the majority didn't pioneer, nor shape this sub-genere - they simply jumped on the bandwagon to follow the trend. We can sit here and argue over whose notable and whose not, but at the end of the day if there's no reliable sources, the material will be removed as it's continuously been doing. --Blastmaster11 (talk) 04:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Tomeepa, any of those assertions would need to be verifiable in a reliable source as well. What I found just now was http://aainnovators.com/Archives/Articles/New%20School%20Hip%20Hop-JKRhee.htm (not sure how reliable that is), which defines: '"Mafioso" rap, which boomed in the mid-1990s, is an extension of East Coast "thug" rap as well as West Coast "gangsta" rap. Whereas gangsta and thug rappers tell tales of life on the ghetto streets, Mafioso rappers spin imaginary fantasies of rappers as Mafiosis, drug kingpins, and organized crime figures'. That goes into the direction you mentioned, but is certainly more specific. One example from the list of artists, you repeatedly listed Shyne as a notable example of a mafioso rapper. Can you give me any reference for that? I can't find one, and I've told you above that I couldn't find sources for many of those names. It may be obvious in your interpretation of "Mafioso Rap", but we can't build an encyclopedia based on people's opinions. One core principle of Wikipedia is WP:VERIFIABILITY. If you continue to ignore that we have a problem. Amalthea  11:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Street Family


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rangilo Gujarati ( talk ) 08:40, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Street Family


A tag has been placed on Street Family, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rangilo Gujarati ( talk ) 09:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Street Family


The article Street Family has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unreferenced, does not qualify WP:Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rangilo Gujarati ( talk ) 09:22, 25 September 2011 (UTC)