User talk:Tomer T/Archive 1

answer to question
Hi Tomer, do you want to add my pics to the hebrew wikipedia? It's alright with me, just add a credit line - " Photo by beivushtang http://www.pbase.com/beivushtang "

Beivushtang 05:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Fields of gold
The reason that photo wasn't promoted is that pictures need more than a simple majority of supporters to be promoted. They need a consensus, and while there is no single 'magic number' of supporters that allows you to make a decision, I tend to look for at least a two-thirds majority. This image only had a few more supporters than opposers, so I was unable to say that there was consensus to promote it. I hope that answers your question. Raven4x4x 22:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does. Thank you for the informative and quick answer. Tomer T 23:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Images for medicine portal
Thank you for your nominations, I included both. :) NCurse work 07:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for including them :) If I'll see more suitable pictures I will nominate them. Tomer T 13:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Crabs at a market
Hi, I closed the nomination as it had been listed at WP:FPC for eight days and there was no consensus to promote it (vote count was 6.5 supports versus 5.5 opposes). Ideally, nominations should be closed after seven days but this is not always possible. If you disagree with the decision, you can ask for a second opinion at WT:FPC or renominate it later. Also, as compression artifacts were among the opposers' complaints, you could ask if Wpopp has an uncompressed version of the image. --KFP (talk | contribs) 14:54, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Row of Icicle
I have uploaded a untilted version of Image:Row of Icicle.jpg as Image:Row of Icicles 2.jpg if you want to nominate it. --Digon3 15:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I have nominated it. Tomer T 16:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You might want to nominate it as a new nomination, otherwise it will be gone in 2 days and no one will see it. --Digon3 16:58, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, so I will nominate it after the current nomination will come to an end. Tomer T 17:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Jordan FAC
The Michael Jordan FAC has been re-listed (which was probably a good idea). Thought you'd like to know, here's a quick link. Quadzilla99 14:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you Tomer T 17:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Nominating Featured Article candidates
Tomer, before you nominate articles at FAC, you should probably inform the main editors and leave a note about what you're planning to do an the article's talk page. I'm the main author of Johannes Kepler, and I was kinda blind-sided by the nomination, which I didn't even notice for several days. The article was not complete, and had I not been on spring break with a lot of free time to work on it, the nomination would not have ended well. That said, thanks for doing that... it lit a fire under my ass, and it all worked out. Wikilove--ragesoss 17:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Western Chalukyas
Thank you for the support. I am proposing a name enhancement from "Western Chalukyas" to "Western Chalukya Empire" to give a better picture about the article. I am the user who nominated this article for FAC.Please comment.Dineshkannambadi 13:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't oppose the name changing. Tomer T 15:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Horseanatomy.png
Hi Tomer,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Horseanatomy.png is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-07-19.  howcheng  {chat} 23:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Killer whale FPC
Hello. A Featured Picture Candidate you commented on, Featured picture candidates/Killer whale mother and calf, is now in the section for "Older nominations requiring additional input from voters." Contributors have tried to improve it after you commented, and your opinion is welcome as to which, if any, of the available versions deserves promotion. I am sending this message to everyone who participated in the FPC. Thanks! Kla'quot 06:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Golda Meir 03265u.jpg
Hi Tomer,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Golda Meir 03265u.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-07-27.  howcheng  {chat} 23:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Toronto Raptors FAC
Hi, I noticed you nominated the Raptors article as a FAC. While that is hugely appreciated, as I have contributed substantially to the article, I honestly feel it is not ready for a FAC --- yet! This is mostly because it is quite long at the moment, with the section on the 2006-07 season being disproportionately long. My intention was to create a separate article for the 2006-07 season once the current NBA season is over. I believe the 2006-07 season merits an independent article because it is and is going to be the most eventual Raptors season ever and there will be plenty of pictures for that too.

Therefore, I suspect many editors will quibble with the current structure of the article. What do you think? Thanks, Chensiyuan 14:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hello Chensiyuan, thanks for commenting and updating me about that. I think you can ask for starting the vote later, after you will finish. And I also wanted to tell you that I put your article as a chosen one here. I also wanted to ask you: Why did you put Devil May Cry 2 in the GAs list on your user page? It is already a FA. Goodbye, Tomer T 16:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, Tomer T. I've noticed that you frequently nominate articles for FAC that you haven't been involved with.  I was hoping, as a courtesy to the involved editors, that you could begin leaving talk page requests for feedback first, to give the editors an opportunity to indicate whether they think the article is ready for FAC ?  It would help streamline the process, lessen the chances of failed facs, and make it less likely that editors will be blind-sided, perhaps at a time when they are too busy to see a nom through FAC.  Regards, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 17:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * By the way, Tomer, I also am hoping you've taken note of the instructions at WP:FAC, specifically "Nominators are expected to make an effort to address objections ... Please do not post more than one nomination at a time, as this may make it difficult to do justice to each." I noticed that you currently have three nominations at FAC (Compass and straightedge constructions, Alfred Russel Wallace and Toronto Raptors), but haven't participated in the discussion about any of these candidates. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 21:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I left notes in some talk pages asking if the article is in FA status in the readers and writer's opinion, but I got no answers. So I decided to stop. Tomer T 10:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I know you nominated the article, but you didn't state whether you supported the nomination. Manderiko 03:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought I don't need to, because it's too obvious. Alright, I'll put my vote. Tomer T 09:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:American World War II senior military officials, 1945.JPEG
Hi Tomer,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:American World War II senior military officials, 1945.JPEG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-08-09.  howcheng  {chat} 23:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Toronto Raptors
Hi the FA nomination has been re-set, kindly re-cast your vote at Featured article candidates/Toronto Raptors. Thank you. Chensiyuan 04:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Alfred Russel Wallace FAC
You might be interestred to know that I have renominated Alfred Russel Wallace for FA.Rusty Cashman 03:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Whaling in the Faroe Islands FAC
Dear Tomer T, (I can see you've had this discussion before). While I think it is a great idea to link articles and awards I do not feel this is the most productive way to go about it. Seriously, please nominate for Good Article Candidacy or Peer Review before attempting FAC. The fact that it wasn't clear whether anyone was actively editing the article and you've only edited it once since the FAC began indicates that it had no chance of passing as you hadn't ensured there would be anyone to address objections.

Can you please nominate only after being actively involved in an article? cheers, Cas Liber | talk  |  contribs 09:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Tim Duncan FAC
Hi, a bunch of us at Wikiproject NBA have been working on the Tim Duncan article and have nominated it for FAC. I remember you made some useful suggestions during the Toronto Raptors FAC. Feel free to leave comments at the FAC here. Thanks! Chensiyuan 13:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:SamuelGompers1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SamuelGompers1.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mbisanz 04:55, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Mbisanz 04:55, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

2007/Week 42: Isaac Titsingh
Re: Isaac Titsingh in the Hebrew WIkipedia ≠ Isaac Titsingh ...?

Tomer T -- I stumbled across your name as I was looking into the background decision-making which preceded the choice of Isaac Titsingh as a plausible subject for the Metawiki's Translation of the week.

When I tried to edit that recently translated English→Hebrew/Dutch→Hebrew "Isaac Titsingh" in Hebrew, I had some problems adding Afrikaans to the list of inter-Wiki links to corollary articles in languages other than Hebrew. Please, would you just check to see if everything appears to be as it should be? Thanks. --Ooperhoofd 18:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's fine. The list of inter-Wiki links was edited since then, and it's now according to our policy in Hebrew Wikipedia. Please notice that in Hebrew Wikipedia we put the link to en in the top of the list, and other wikis come after that, alphabetically. --Tomer T 22:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

No content in Category:NBA's MVP prize winners
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:NBA's MVP prize winners, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:NBA's MVP prize winners has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:NBA's MVP prize winners, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Language
Hello, I've selected your picture as picture of the month in the Language portal. Regards,--Auslli (talk) 16:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Jennifer's Body GA nomination
Hello, Tomer T. Being the main contributor of this article, I would have appreciated you discussing whether or not this article is ready for GA status on the talk page first. There are still further improvements I wanted to make to it before nominating it for GA, such as adding a Marketing section and cutting down a bit on the quoting in the Critical reception section. But at least you see the article already being good enough for GA status. So I thank you for that. Flyer22 (talk) 19:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You're right, I should have done that. Anyway, you're welcome and good luck. Tomer T (talk) 19:31, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Park Ji-Sung GAN
I have begun to review the above article here but have placed it on hold. There are several issues which would justify quick-failing the article, but I am prepared to put it on hold for a week. However, I noticed that you were not a contributor to the article and you may struggle to find people to make the required changes in time, particularly as sourcing is one of them. If you don't think it can be done, please let me know and I will have to fail it. --Sarastro1 (talk) 10:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I will struggle to solve these problems in time. You may fail it. Tomer T (talk) 18:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Mel Gibson DUI incident
I've started a GA review of this article. You can find it here. --Moni3 (talk) 13:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Dirac delta function
As the original review was flawed, I have renominated it, with a timestamp one hour later than the original, so hopefully you will get a proper review soon. Sadly, I don't feel qualified to review it myself. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive2
As a reviewer at Featured article candidates/Michael Jordan, I thought you might consider commenting at Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive2.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Perfect games
Can you add a section for 27 batsmen games that were not perfect. I.E., runners reached and were retired caught stealing or in double plays.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:03, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Perfect game/GA1
I just put this on hold. See the link above for details. Incidentally, I see you were one of the reviewers on the Air Jordan article. Hoped you liked I was the one that nominated it and left you that message up there! (I've changed my name since then obviously) AaronY (talk) 07:38, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sheldon Cooper
The article Sheldon Cooper you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Sheldon Cooper for things which need to be addressed. Sumsum2010 · T · C 23:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Actor/filmmakers
Hello. I see that you are changing the priorities of "importance" for many biographies on the WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. I don't think it's very appropriate for you to make these changes yourself - particularly regarding "top" importance since I think that was decided by a consensus. Could you revert your changes and start a discussion on the project talk page instead? --Lobo512 (talk) 15:53, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you sure all of these were decided by concensus to be regarded as "top importance"? There were some irreasonable classifications, such as classyfing Sid Caesar as "top importance". Where can I read the discussions leading to these classifications? Where exactly should I propose changes in classifications? Tomer T (talk) 15:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well of course it's possible that some people have later changed the priority, since it's so easy (as you've demonstrated). And I agree that Sid Caesar is probably one instance of this since he clearly isn't top importance, and in that case it is fair to change it. But there definitely was a discussion in the first place - see here at Ernst Lubitsch for instance, a note was left saying that he had been selected as top importance. Go to the project talk page and ask there about who is meant to be top importance (I already gave you the link). I'm sure you're edits were in good faith, and I do actually agree with some of your changes, but wikiprojects are supposed to be about consensus so if you think changes need to be made, please propose it first. --Lobo512 (talk) 16:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I assumed there were no discussions as there were some irreasonable classifications. I made only changes that seemed to me as undisputable. I'll revert my changes, and propose all the changes in the talk page (except Cate Blanchet because it was fixed later by someone else; you're welcome to give your response there afterwards). I'll also be glad to know: you said that you agree with some of my changes. Can you give example(s) for change(s) I did that you didn't agree with, and why? (By the way, I didn't see a discussion about Lubitsch, only a notification) (p.s. 2: if you have administrator rights, I'll be glad if you will revert all my changes, because the undoing method is quite slow) Tomer T (talk) 16:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh no I'm not an admin or anyone important, I just watch a lot of actor/director pages. And I don't know where this discussion happened, but the notes left on talk pages suggest that one did indeed happen at some point. Those "irreasonable classifications" were probably ones changed later by random users. Or, it's because the priority definitions ask that top importance people are "extremely well known", not just extremely influential...which I'm not actually sure I agree with, but that's how it stands currently. I do think it's time for a new discussion on all this. --Lobo512 (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I reverted most of the changes. I think the ones I left are highly indisputable (correct me if I'm wrong). I will open a discussion about all of these articles soon. Thanks for guidnace. Tomer T (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * That's cool, thank you for being cooperative. And yep, let's definitely get a discussion going. --Lobo512 (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Veliko Tarnovo - Varosha quarter.jpg

 * Thanks for nominating this photo of mine.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 17:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Community input required: lowering delist bar at FPC
You are receiving this because of your current or past association with the Featured Pictures project. Following on from several cases where closers did not observe the prescribed minimum votes required for a delisting, there is now a motion to entirely dismiss the requirement for a minimum. Please participate in the discussion as wide-ranging changes may arise.

Link: Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 14:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Arizona meets New York
The nomination has been put on hold to determine which edit is preferred. As you voted but did not indicate a preference, could you leave some feedback at the nomination page? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:11, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Main page feedback
Re: Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 22, 2012 - almost nobody watches those pages. (I'm probably the only one) For future reference, Talk:Main_Page is a better place to leave such comments, because someone might actually see it and act on it reasonably quickly. Raul654 (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Reasonable. Thanks, Tomer T (talk) 16:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Émile Cartailhac
I'm sorry that my "texturing" do you have put in a bad position. You who have always been kind to me. I hope our friends will be fair play. Best regards. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Fire Salamander

 * Thank you for the Salamander! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

RfC WP:FPC
Hello, some time earlier, you commented/voted on Featured picture candidates/Pythagoras similar triangles proof. The file is renominated at Featured picture candidates/Pythagoras similar triangles proof simplified with many issues addressed. Your comments about the new version would be appreciated.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
I've commented on your candidate for FP, would you care to submit your opinion on mine? Thanks! WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  20:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

MERCI
Bonjour, Merci pour Featured picture candidates/Pterophorus pentadactyla --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * De rien (I don't really know French, I hope what I wrote means "you're welcome" :) Tomer T (talk) 06:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * You speak French very well! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Annkathrin Kammeyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for nominating Prodasineura verticalis to FP. --Joydeep (talk) 12:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Happy to do that. Tomer T (talk) 05:21, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for the barnstar. Tomer T (talk) 14:25, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Trifolium pratense
I've added the alt suggested by Jkadavoor. I hope that's okay. Samsara (FA • FP) 20:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It's okay, although I don't think it's suitable for FP. Tomer T (talk) 20:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

saw your link on the featured pics part of wikipedia
i have a passion for photography and i took this photo in cuenca spain & i saw you on the wikipedia pages for featured pics, i was wondering what you thought i this, i would like to get it nominated - 15th century house in cuenca spain ! thanks in advance......cheers & have a great day


 * Hello. The picture looks quite nice, but I'm afraid it's not sharp enough to be a featured picture. Please see Featured picture criteria. Tomer T (talk) 18:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

thanks for the imput - i have taken a look at many of your photos and now understand i need to work on the sharpness !

cheers and have a great day !

POTD notification
Hi Tomer,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Samuel Reshevsky versus the World.JPG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 26, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-11-26. — howcheng  {chat} 00:06, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Nice work
Thanks for all the FPC nominations you've posted recently - I imagine that they're the tip of the iceberg of the images you're sorting through, and your high success rate with them speaks for itself. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your kind words. Tomer T (talk) 06:40, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

The Dalles Bridge image
I want to explain why I reverted your change. Your new image was good, but not, IMHO, for that spot. It has too many extraneous elements which take focus away from the bridge. Also, unless a user clicks the image, the bridge itself is harder to see than the older image. For the infobox, we need a strong image of the bridge per se. You might include your image later in the article, and a bit bigger. That's your call. - Denimadept (talk) 08:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not my image. Actually my edit's purpose was to highlight more the previous (and current) lead image, by displaying it in larger resolution. I think the article was more appealing in my version. Please consider it again. Tomer T (talk) 08:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Please take a look at it now and let me know what you think. - Denimadept (talk) 08:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, I don't think it's good. There's no reason to display a regular-proportions image in that way, and the current version highlights the less-good image. And proportions-wise, a panorama is not the best choice for an infobox. To sum it up, I don't think that being a "lead image" always means this is the most important image in the article, and in my version the panorama was the most important image. Tomer T (talk) 08:25, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I guess I don't understand. In my mind, the best image for an infobox of a bridge shows the bridge prominently.  It doesn't include other elements unless they can't be avoided.  If you really think the image you put in was better on or not on those terms, feel free to revert me.  Honest. - Denimadept (talk) 08:31, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I agree that the panorama image is far better. But I think a better way to show it in the article would be at 800px. Tomer T (talk) 08:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * You mean, as a Wide image? - Denimadept (talk) 08:39, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, or like that. Tomer T (talk) 08:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Ha! Okay, I've put 'em back.  I think this does justice for the pano but it may be rather large.  The actual image is huge! - Denimadept (talk) 08:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Glad we sorted this out. Tomer T (talk) 09:07, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Nice picture
I've never participated in a FP process, but I saw Featured picture candidates/Canis mesomelas closed without promotion and I thought to myself, that it was kind of a shame. I would have voted support. I think it is a striking image and I enjoyed looking at it. Thanks for sharing it. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 19:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Tomer T (talk) 16:30, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/John Day Formation

 * Thank you for nominating this image, and thank you to the others who contributed to the process. Finetooth (talk) 17:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. Tomer T (talk) 20:54, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi Tomer,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:SemenovaKsenia5-edit2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 20, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-12-20. — howcheng  {chat} 17:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

GA nomination of Skeptic's Toolbox
I reviewed your article, however, there are a few things that need to be improved before a final decision is made.-- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 00:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brian Herzlinger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Corbett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Leiocephalus personatus
Hello Tomer T, Thank you very much for the nomination :-)! Best regards--	Holleday (talk) 11:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Loren Pankratz
Hey Tomer, I've finally reviewed Loren Pankratz, sorry it took so long. Unfortunately I've failed it, you can check out my comments at Talk:Loren Pankratz/GA1. Let me know if I can be of any help with anything. Peace, delldot   &nabla;.  06:26, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Beppe Grillo FPC
May I suggest that you withdraw the nom, add the image as the lead in Beppe Grillo, give an English translation on the image page, then renominate in a week? I think this would sail through FPC after that was done. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I answered in the vote's page. Tomer T (talk) 00:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

number of picture nominee
Hi dear Tomer T. I have a question. How many files can an User nominate in Featured picture candidates? What dose regulation say about this? thanks a million. Alborzagros (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I think there's no upper bound. Tomer T (talk) 15:00, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


 * THANKS Alborzagros (talk) 15:18, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Tsarskoye Selo Lyceum

 * BTW maybe you should consider archiving this page. It it quite long. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:19, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Will do. Tomer T (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2013 (UTC)