User talk:Tomica/Archive 20

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Numb (Usher song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Unapologetic
Completely not what I was expecting. And the album cover is her best to date. AARON &bull; TALK  20:09, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Tbh, Side Effects sounded better (that will be a song probably though :)), but I like this one too. And about the artwork, yeah it's one of the best but it can't beat the flawless Loud, sorry :P! — Tomíca (T2ME) 20:11, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know, "Side Effects" sounds better as a song I think. Mariah has a song called "Side Effects". I did like the Loud album cover but I wish her eyes were open :-) lol. I like how she doesn't even put the "R" on the cover now, she is so famous she doesn't even need anything to do with her name on the cover lol. I still don't like that tattoo though. AARON &bull; TALK   20:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I definitely agree with the both last points. The 'R' logo became just so boring, it was everything during the Talk That Talk era, and the tatoo, well, it has a nice symbolization, but is pretty big :/... but that's it. Btw, "Diamonds" is slaying in the top-ten everywhere, except the US. People there are stupid, they buy the Kesha crap instead of it. She need a live performance. — Tomíca (T2ME) 20:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Rihanna needs to learn to film a music video and release it before releasing the single to buy, and to back it up with a live performance too. She should have sung "Diamonds" at the VMAs. I think it should be released to A/C radio, I think it would be a hit on the A/C chart and Adult Pop chart. I think it's a bit alternative too. I'm shocked it hit #1 on the US R&B. AARON &bull; TALK   20:23, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Well, having the fact that the festival season is coming I am sure she will be performing at the AMA's and EMA's. Also the X Factors in the US and the UK + a video, I know that will rise, but she need to hurry :). I think she will do this well live, cause i think it fits her voice well. — Tomíca (T2ME) 20:27, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, her voice is still maturing. She sounds noticeably better with each album. I want full, proper, well sung songs on this album. No interludes, no 2:50 long songs, just well sung songs. This crucial that this album is #1 in the US, because several media outlets always focus on that. They forget how successful her singles are. AARON &bull; TALK   20:34, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's crucial for her career to make this album number-one in the US. I don't care for the UK, cause I know it will hit number-one very very very easy ;) ! — Tomíca (T2ME) 21:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah it will hit #1 here no problem. "Diamonds" did. AARON &bull; TALK   21:38, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Apologies
Hi Tomica, I was just looking through my talk page and saw a song sample request from you back in July that I somehow completely missed. Just saying sorry!  S ' D ' 5  20:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey SD5, no problem. What's up with you? Not active anymore or... — Tomíca (T2ME) 21:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sort of slowly returning to activity after a ~6 month break!  S ' D ' 5  21:31, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Nice to hear that :). Cheers! — Tomíca (T2ME) 21:31, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

I am online
Zac (talk) 08:34, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Stargate (production team)
Hi. You've either edited Stargate (production team) or edited an article recently related to it. The article is currently up for a Good Article Review at Talk:Stargate (production team)/GA2. If you have time to assist in making changes so it can keep its GA status, that would be appreciated. :) --LauraHale (talk) 08:42, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

"We Found Love" was intended for Leona Lewis!
Read here. AARON &bull; TALK  16:07, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Haha. I read it and I find it funny tbh. Why is she declaring that now? "The same production, but my version was better"? Really?:) Stick to "Trouble" girl. "We Found Love" was born for Rihanna. The end :D— Tomíca (T2ME) 16:09, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Because we've known for more than a year that she had worked with Calvin Harris but no one ever knew the name of the song, and it was obviously kept quiet because of that. Now it makes sense that it was that song she recorded. Leona would have sung it better to be honest, Leona sings all cover versions/other versions better. AARON &bull; TALK   16:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Really? I don't agree. If Leona released the song would it be 10 weeks at number-one on the Hot 100 and 6 in the UK? Would it sell like 6.5 million copies worldwide? I don't think so ;). So I think Calvin Harris did a good choice. Actually it has really a lead single power. — Tomíca (T2ME) 16:18, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Who knows? Leona has a much better voice than Rihanna so it doesn't matter what song it is, Leona would sound better. Rihanna's music video definitely helped sales, and Leona wouldn't have done something as x-rated lol. Leona's version of Halo would be better too. AARON &bull; TALK   16:21, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Haha what? O please don't talk insane things :). Halo is flawless only and only only as performed by Beyonce Knowles ! :) And of course that We Found Love by her wouldn't be so successful as by Rihanna because first of all it's not her type of music, she is a ballad performer and people would find odd that she sings a fast dance tune. I like her, and I like "Bleeding Love", but obviously she is not more powerful than Rihanna. Maybe she has a powerful voice, but only that nothing more. — Tomíca (T2ME) 16:25, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not talking insane thing. The songs were written for Leona first, so obviously they had her in mind for the song first. Powerful is not a right choice of word, we aren't talking about Queens lol. Leona has a far more outstanding voice. AARON &bull; TALK   18:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Read this please. — Tomíca (T2ME) 20:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It was likely written for Leona. Ryan probably didn't want to get caught up in it. He has collaborated with Leona a lot more than Beyonce. AARON &bull; TALK   20:59, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't agree that Leona is better than Beyonce. — Tomíca (T2ME) 21:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I never said that? I said that Ryan has worked with Leona a lot more. AARON &bull; TALK   21:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

You indirectly said it. Leona's version of Halo would be better too. How come when she lacks Beyonce's vocals and emotion? She is good, but now flawless. Sorry, that's my personal opinion. — Tomíca (T2ME) 21:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry Tommy, but Leona is a far more gifted vocalist than Beyonce and obviously worlds ahead of Rihanna. I don't like her, but its the truth.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   21:17, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Haha. King B, she cannot pull her. She has bigger vocal range than Rihanna, but Beyonce? No she can't with her. I am sorry. And of course she has a less superstar power than both. If she have been a gifted superstar (in the whole definition) she would be a global superstar until know with a lot of successes. She is fine, but not ultra. — Tomíca (T2ME) 21:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Success has nothing to do with talent. Many huge talents unfortunately never see the light of day. Yes, Leona is indeed a superior vocalist in every way. Beyonce just doesn't have a unique voice.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me
 * No I never indirectly said that. Nothing I said could be interpreted as that. AARON &bull; TALK   21:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Diamonds
No hate buddy :) Her songs are usually pretty good. She just doesn't impress me. I like it; definitely not her best, but a B, whereas "We Found Love" would be an A+. That's my favorite from her :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   20:51, 14 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Haha, no that means I slightly like her :) Yes, I agree, I just don't think it's on par with the best alternative power ballads. Hmm, I'm a bit confused as to which section you're referring to.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   20:57, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Glassheart
Nowhere does it say at Template:Infobox single that track listings in the infobox are purely for navigation. They are for both navigation and information. Whilst I agree that at the moment it is not able to aid much in terms of navigation as it is collapsible there no reason for its exclusion as it does not take up space. Equally it provides information about the sequencing of songs on the album particularly as two versions of "Trouble" feature on the album. I'd appreciate it if people would discuss things rather than just hit the revert button straight away, particularly when the situation involves experienced editors who have a good standing amongst the community as well as WP:GAs etc. I'm not a newcomer so please don't bite my edits like I am one. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  00:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, who is saying that you is in question here? I didn't have idea that you created the template, which btw is totally useless at the moment. If people want to see information they can just click to the album page and see the track listing. Only one song is linked in it and I strongly believe that it should be deleted ATM. When more songs articles are created, then it can stay. — Tomíca (T2ME) 00:10, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * As i've pointed out, because the template is collapsed it doesn't use any additional space and yes while it doesn't necessarily aid in navigation at this particularly moment in time it serves a clear purpose, and that is to provide the sequencing of the album. Clicking to the album page is inefficient particularly when the inclusion of the template has little/zero impact on the space/layout of the article. its there for use if people want it, but its inclusion has no harm nor does it break any editorial policy. As mentioned the template guidelines make no mention of the need for track listing templates in the infobox to include lots of links/individual pages for songs. SO whilst you strongly believe it should be deleted that's purely editorial choice and nothing to do with guidelines etc. Sorry if my first message came across as harsh, but it seems people are quick to press revert and then discuss why afterwards. That's not the spirit of wikipedia. Particularly if its an editorial issue... i.e. something that isn't backed by a particular policy, one should discuss before hitting revert that's all. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  00:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Zac (talk &middot; contribs) 23:30, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * OMG! Thank you buddy, I needed this so bad. I know you mean it! Thanks x 10 ! — Tomíca (T2ME) 20:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem man. How's life treating ya? All this work I'm getting means my life has been pretty dull, little time for Wikipedia.  Et 3  rnal  20:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, tbh same to me. My exams start soon, so life will be a little bit off, studying and shit. :@ But, well, it will pass. It will be good I guess:). How about you? Cheers ! — Tomíca (T2ME) 20:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I have my earliest exams in January, so I'll have to be studying during the holidays. Besides school though, nothing else has happened really, except the usual depressing English weather.  Et 3  rnal  14:16, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC)