User talk:Tomica/Archive 31

Come online
— AARON  &bull; TALK   19:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

RE: FAC
I'm not sure if I can comment, support or not, since I contributed to the article with one of the copy-edits. If you havent already, you could try soliciting random users from the article's associated WikiProjects, like R&B/soul or WP:SONGS. Tomcat7 and BrothaTimothy are experienced editors who've reviewed R&B articles before for FA, for instance. Dan56 (talk) 03:23, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Re:Cry Me a River
Hey. I put my two cents in the featured article discussion. It definitely has a very good chance of being a featured article. Good work. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 14:39, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Mirrors (Justin Timberlake song)
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Brunomars-natalie.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Brunomars-natalie.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Brunomars-natalie.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Brunomars-natalie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Did you see this?
Sorry but I really think he was shading you here. He is also planning to get me blocked. LOL. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 04:11, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Are we at a dance club? Grow up, guys.--Aichik (talk) 21:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

New sales source
Hey there! I was wondering if you think this new source (from yesterday) is reliable enough to use as an updated singles figure on the Rihanna page? Given Rolling Stone's reliable and neutral status? We know the current figure of 75 million is extremely conservative given that Billboard confirmed 58 million singles in the US alone (as of late 2012).

The article might also be good to quote from in the new legacy section: "Going by numbers alone, Rihanna is already written into the history books in bold ink." 333cale (talk) 04:35, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Well the source says 100 million records, which is already in the article [25 million albums and 75 million singles], I don't see a reason for repeating sources. If it said 100 million singles, then it would be different story. Btw, good contribution to the legacy section. Cheers! — Tomíca (T2ME) 08:20, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, true- I assumed that their "digital sales" was only referencing singles (like Billboard's US numbers). But you're right, it's not explicit in that. And thanks very much! Glad I could help. 333cale (talk) 22:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Lol
I am online —  AARON  &bull; TALK   20:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm going out in a minute, just came here to check what's happening. Will talk to you later or tomorrow ;) ! — Tomíca (T2ME) 20:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Lol okay. I was checking emails when I saw u had said hi 7 minutes before lol  —  AARON  &bull; TALK   20:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Insatiable (Darren Hayes song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to IRMA


 * The Man Who Never Lied (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Chorus (music)


 * U Make Me Wanna (Blue song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to IRMA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for FutureSex/LoveSound
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Cry Me a River
You're welcome. :) I had already checked your answers, everything is A-okay. Good luck!  Snap Snap  01:45, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Sorry, I'm still familiarizing myself with reviewing FACs.  Snap Snap  18:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.
Thank you for efforts to preseve the integrity of wikipediea. In the subject of Pon de Replay I believe you have made an innocent mistake. User:Causeandedit is an editor dedicated to promoting Jonathan Hay releated subjects. See Conflict of interest/Noticeboard and WP:ANI. Please reconsider your reversion of my edit. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't understand a thing you just said. I reverted you because you removed sources without a reason. — Tomíca (T2ME) 14:54, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Which "source"? The one introduced by the spamming editor wp:COIN who is doing his best to spam Jonathan Hay into everything? The editor who is trying to pretend they accidendly mistook United Kingdom for "University of Kentucky" see Jonathan Hay is really important?. See also the COIN and the ANI about that editor. duffbeerforme (talk) 15:22, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * There is a good reason to remove those "sources". Stores are not reliable sources. Wikipedia is not here to provide an avenue for these shops to promote their product. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Those are perfectly good sources when it comes to release dates for songs and albums. Otherwise how we gonna do the release chronology. Remove the span thing, but don't take those sources. They are crucial.— Tomíca (T2ME) 13:43, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * They are not. Where is the "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". nowhere cause they are trying to sell a product. They are not crucial, they are spam. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Chartbot
I noticed that you reverted Chartbot here. I looked into it, and saw that Billboard has a bit of database corruption, with multiple entries for "Justin Timberlake". I fixed BillboardID/J to point at the uncorrupted version.

Please, when you see something like this, let me know. If you revert Chartbot, it's just going to make the same mistake the next time unless you tell me.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Revert of my edit
What is wrong with my edit that just changes the reflink by using the given template? All other charts were added by using the template, but these four not? i cannot understand this. --Ali1610 (talk) 16:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of No Hay Igual
The article No Hay Igual you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:No Hay Igual for things which need to be addressed. Diva   Knockouts   16:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

RE:Email
Thankyou Tomica. Till 23:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

See to this ignorant being please
— AARON  &bull; TALK   14:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Doesn't he release he is the spam indeed, not the release sources LOL. Good, it was reverted by some other user. ;) — Tomíca (T2ME) 15:49, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Doing my head in lol —  AARON  &bull; TALK   16:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Non-sense stuff. — Tomíca (T2ME) 16:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Actually, he had a point. We normally don't use commercial links as references. What's so important about having individual release dates for every European country that it warrants a rack of commercial links?&mdash;Kww(talk) 17:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi. Settlted down a bit. I'd just like in the future that if you disagere with my effort to improve this encyclopediedia I'd appreciate that you did not reduce things to personal attacks on my inteligence. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:18, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Rihanna pour it up choreography.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rihanna pour it up choreography.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Do you have time for a GA review?
Hi Tomica. I nominated this article. I worked hard on it and I really want it to become a GA. I saw you already reviewed some music-related GAs, so I'd like to ask you to review it if you got the time. Thanks in advance!--Rod840 (talk) 21:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Pour It Up
Is in desperate need of attention lol —  AARON  &bull; TALK   15:13, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Indeed, although I am more in Rated R and I have a super plan for it that I am gonna tell it to you later if you are online ;) ! — Tomíca (T2ME) 15:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Lol okay do you want me to come online? —  AARON  &bull; TALK   16:07, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, come. — Tomíca (T2ME) 16:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Already am —  AARON  &bull; TALK   16:11, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Red Tour Setlist
I see you reverted the Red Tour setlist back to the old revision. I changed it to what is correct, what is there now is wrong. She has not sang Fifteen or Ours in the concerts, the songs in my edit are correct. See setlists at http://www.setlist.fm/search?query=tour:%28Red+Tour%29&artist=3bd6bc5c or Youtube videos proving it. 131.151.186.123 (talk) 20:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * That's unreliable source. I am afraid I will have to revert again. — Tomíca (T2ME) 20:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I also agree that it doesn't need to be updated for every song. But I see that the songs there right now are incorrect. The source cited there is an unreliable source, they are wrong. Perhaps put "Taylor's Choice" or "Alternate Song" or something like that? 99.13.112.205 (talk) 16:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * LMAO. How is a published magazine an unreliable source? — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 02:32, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Because it's on their blog, and it's wrong! 131.151.186.123 (talk) 04:27, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It isn't wrong. — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 04:34, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - March 2013
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC)