User talk:Tomica/Archive 32

Nomination of The Man Who Never Lied for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Man Who Never Lied is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Man Who Never Lied until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James086 Talk 14:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Rated R
Anything I can do? — AARON  &bull; TALK   17:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I recall adding only stuff from the reviews, so if I'm relegated to dealing with whatever that entails, that's cool. This seems to be your baby. Congrats on the FA promotion! BTW, would you be interested in reviewing my GAN for Song of Innocence? It's been sitting around for a month, and I'd like to nominate it for FA. It's a breeze to review (at least I think so). If not, no need to reply back. Dan56 (talk) 19:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Calvin: Yes, you can start doing Singles and Commercial performance, I guess Dan can help with the Critical reception :). And yes Dan I can review it for you, will take it now. — Tomíca (T2ME) 19:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay —  AARON  &bull; TALK   19:33, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * What is the actual release date for "Russian Roulette"? The lead and info box says 26 October but the release table says 27th. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   23:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It's October 27, fixed it in the infobox. — Tomíca (T2ME) 23:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:RihanHab.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:RihanHab.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:43, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rihanna - Talk That Talk - Cover - Deluxe.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Rihanna - Talk That Talk - Cover - Deluxe.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Talk That Talk - Rihanna.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Talk That Talk - Rihanna.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:53, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Unfaithful.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Unfaithful.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:57, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

"Rated R" cover
Why the duplicate image? &mdash;Kww(talk) 05:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Rihanna_Rated_R.jpg
 * File:Rihanna - Rated R.png
 * I didn't duplicate it, I just uploaded a png version of because they are with better quality.— Tomíca (T2ME) 08:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
— Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 18:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter
We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate  (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr, on the European hare , on the constellation Circinus ( and ) and on the Third Epistle of John. All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

 * Thank You Penguin, glad that you are back and you know I am still waiting for "LWTYL" to become one. :) 16:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I do feel rejuvenated, but will keep the wikibreak banner until I've caught up on some work. I'll take things easy and gain experience at AfD for the next few days. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  16:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * And you with AfD? OMG ... lol :) Nvm, just came back so you can fulfill the space here on Wiki ;) — Tomíca (T2ME) 16:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sure no one missed me. Some may have even sighed a breath of relief when I put up the banner. :) — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  16:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't want to be repetitive, but I missed you :). Really, I am not faking at all. — Tomíca (T2ME) 16:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You have time? We can talk on Hotmail once I've figured out the new layout. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  16:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Indeed I have. I will go online :) — Tomíca (T2ME) 16:40, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Question
Hi Tomica. I have a question. I've searched for a review in Rolling Stone magazine, but I didn't find anything. They publish all reviews on online version or not? If they don't, is there anyway to read the magazine online and find the content (like Google Books)? Zheek (talk) 20:53, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Zheek. Well first of all, are you sure that that review existed (have you seen it before)? I mean did a reviewer from Rolling Stone posted about the song/album etc? I am not sure if they publish all of their reviews online, and I think that their content is not available on Google Books. But, if you have the information from the review, but you don't have the link you can use this kind of style for the reference. — Tomíca (T2ME) 21:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)


 * It's a source which used on the article Free Yourself (a studio album by Fantasia Barrino). But I did not find anything and it's a URL to online version. So I'm not sure about it. The article is old and I stated to work on it. Would you please look at that article? Maybe I should remove that old ref and insert new sources for the review/rating section. Zheek (talk) 23:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Jump (Rihanna song)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

"Jump"
Why is it not GA nominated? Looks fine to me? — AARON  &bull; TALK   00:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * It's totally fine, but I guess because of its single potentiality ? lol — Tomíca (T2ME) 00:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Really? "Right Now" is the obvious choice. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   00:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * OMFG are you kidding me? She doesn't even perform "Right Now" on the Diamonds World Tour, what makes you thing she will release it? I am like 95% sure "Jump" will be a single. — Tomíca (T2ME) 00:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Because she know's it will be a number one song in the UK :-) —  AARON  &bull; TALK   00:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Strawberry Bubblegum
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)