User talk:Tomica/Archive 7

Hey
I've done your comments on the FLC. Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 16:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Helllllo? Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 17:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oooops. Sorry I will check them. — Tomica   (talk)  17:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Unfaithful FAC
Hello. I wouldn't mind reviewing the article, although I would probably be delayed in doing so as I have a lot of other review work piled up.  Auree   ★  22:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Don't Stop the Music (Rihanna song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BEA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

About a Girl
Hey:) were you intending on doing the review anytime soon? I'm probably going to finish Ugly as well so yeah. Till I Go Home (talk) 08:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I will start, soon, very soon. Sorry, I was busy. — Tomica   (talk)  13:11, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I addressed those issues on the page, don't think they're all of them though. I also finished Ugly and it's up at WP:GAN :). Till I Go Home (talk)
 * I am continuing the review right away ! :) ... Do you like the Sugababes so much?:) — Tomica   (talk)  12:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Hahaha, I ♥ Sugababes:). Till I Go Home (talk)
 * To be honest I never listened to them. I like their name though :)! — Tomica   (talk)  13:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh lol. Well they're quite big in Europe so maybe you heard at least one song of theirs. Till I Go Home (talk)
 * Yeah, I know their name. Right they were big. And maybe probably I heard some song on the radio :P !— Tomica   (talk)  11:20, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It was probably this, haha. Till I Go Home (talk)

Stop reverting me.
now. Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 15:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I am and I will. Because the template shouldn't look like that. And I am not the only who shares that opinion. — Tomica   (talk)  15:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You and one other. It works for other singer's, so it works here. The standalone Rihanna template isn't even used on many Rihanna articles. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 15:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Well as I can see you are alone. The Rihanna templates its use on all the articles that are placed in it. Singles the same. So I don't see the reason for changing it. You mentioned Lady Gaga articles; they don't use the template you just created. They use a simple template because Lady Gaga has much smaller number of singles than Rihanna. When her single number raises, separate templates will be created. Its the same as Beyonce, Madonna, Eminem and everybody. So don't change it. — Tomica   (talk)  15:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You wanted to create the same one last year. And you are presenting a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Just because you and one other doesn't it like, doesn't mean you are right. Yeah I did mention Lady Gaga, and I also said that hers is similar, not the same. Aaron ' &bull; You  Da  One 15:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I know. But that was a year ago, I have changed my opinions for some Wiki stuff for God sake. Calvin, there were a lot of people who didn't like my idea. This is I don't like it, it is not right. I don't see the reason for creating one HUGE template. Rihanna is widely know artist who releases a lot of singles and albums. That kind of huge template it doesn't fit right. — Tomica   (talk)  15:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * "there were a lot of people who didn't like my idea" - doesn't look like people had much of a problem on the talk page. Katy Perry has exactly the same one and it works fine. The Rihanna template has no place, it's small as has links to articles which do not exist. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 15:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The only link that redirects is Roc The Block Tour. So there are not a lot, its just one. Katy Perry has two studio albums (one which is not counting for unknown reason) and that template could be applied. Here is something different. Rihanna has 6 studio albums and more thatn 30 singles. I mean I opened the HUGE template and to be honest there was a mash-up in my head. Sorry again, but I am reverting it. — Tomica   (talk)  15:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * GGGB and Rated R remix compilation links also redirected. A mash-up in your head is not a valid reason. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 15:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * They redirect on their sister articles so I don't see problem with that. Mhm, you are right mash-up is not, but Madonna/Madonna singles, Beyoncé Knowles/Beyoncé Knowles singles or Eminem/Eminem singles. They together with Rihanna are aritsts who have released more than 3 studio albums and as of that result has separate templates here. — Tomica   (talk)  15:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It's more functional to have it in one template. Why are two needed? The standalone Rihanna one was not needed. It contained next to no information. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 15:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * All in all its very untidy. We use two, one for the singles, one for the albums, this one is huge and so untidy. — Tomica   (talk)  15:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh c'mon, it's not untidy at all. Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 15:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh Calvin. Yeah it is. A lot of untidiness. Why just don't leave it as it was? I don't see problem with that. I have given you a lot of examples. Or maybe put a voting on the talk page between those two versions? — Tomica   (talk)  16:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not untidy at all. I don't think you understand what untidy means, because that template is not. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 16:06, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Haahaha. Now I don't know basic English. Bravoo. By untidy I mean the second point. — Tomica   (talk)  16:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The template is not untidy. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 16:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

My two cents
Let me welcome myself. Lol. I don't like to see you two fighting. :( Please don't do this. Listen, I think one template is more than enough for Rihanna. As far I know, she has many singles and albums but that's all. She has a limited number of films (2), live album (1), no EP, no video album, one perfume, no soundtracks, no major articles related to her (other topics) - which is NOT the case for Beyonce, Eminem and Madonna. Rihanna may have xxx number of albums and singles but we all know that it can fit very well in an all-in-one template. Music is what makes her notable. She does not have an established image as a songwriter (for her own albums or others' albums), live performer, actress, etc. All this to say that in my opinion, she should receive the same treatment as Katy Perry. Please, don't get angry at me. I am only stating my opinion with good reasons (I believe). Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You are welcome on my page always, since you are the best friend here (for me of course). Even though I respect you a lot, I can't agree with you here. Rihanna has a video album, has a perfume, Rihanna has a book and + two films in which she is feature, that's enough for having two templates, Rihanna and Rihanna singles. — Tomica   (talk)  18:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Aww thanks my little Tommy. :D Listen, I never denied those (a video album, has a perfume, ... two films) but I did mention the quantity is an issue. It does not look good to have a template for one of this, one of that, one of the other, two of those, etc. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 18:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry again, I don't agree. The template look just alright. Please have a look how this is untidy and head mash-up. Really, but really I have a mash-up when I see it and its untidy.— Tomica   (talk)  22:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you, thank you very much my friend :D ! — Tomica   (talk)  01:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Hmm?
What happened here? Looks dangerous. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  18:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I would say that this IP is playing with fire. I don't know why is removing the chart. I reverted him for second time (some user did it before me), but he continued. O gosh... — Tomica   (talk)  18:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The article used to get vandalized a lot before it was completely re-written back in July. Ah, good times. Things are blue these days. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  18:40, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * OMG. The article was horrible. I remember it. When you completely re-wrote I was so happy and gave you a barnstar. I mean, you have made a masterpiece, since then. — Tomica   (talk)  18:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Enough with the complements Tomica! "Rehab" speaks for itself. :-) — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  23:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I know you think that I am biasing you, but that's not true. :) And why didn't you like the "WFL" performance? Vocally, the style of it? I really like the whole performance called "Rihanna and Coldplay" :D ! — Tomica   (talk)  23:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I liked the duet with Chris Martin, but I hated her hair and I just don't like the song. Sorry. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  00:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay. Vocally the performance was great. For all the haters that hate her :D haha. And Coldplay were awesome, never listened to them actively, but I think I will start! — Tomica   (talk)  10:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Her singing was meh: not awful but not Grammy-live-performance amazing, sorry! — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  20:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * She is not like Adele vocally, but I love her more than anyone and her voice is my passion (lol, this sound like poetry) :D ! — Tomica   (talk)  21:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * That's OK. Not everyone likes the same music. :) The acoustic intro to WFL at the Grammys was actually good. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  02:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Definitely. I respect all the music tastes and people who listen to them. The intro was incredible, it really showed her vocals. For example opposite of her, Chris Brown had some really good moves, but vocally, he was lip-syncing nearly the whole all the performance. — Tomica   (talk)  10:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment on my proposed changes?
Hi. I had a disagreement with User:Journalist on changes I made to 21 (Adele album). I'd appreciate if I could get some comments to the talk page post opened, where I'm at step zero and proposing the changes. Comment? Dan56 (talk) 05:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Talk:About a Girl (Sugababes song)
According to the history at Talk:About a Girl (Sugababes song), you passed the song without completing the procedures at WP:GAC. Could you please do so.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Tony. Don't understand? What specifically ? — Tomica   (talk)  18:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Love the Way You Lie
An obvious IP-hopping vandal. (Mind you, I'm not saying the IP hopping is on purpose.) I've issued this one an "only warning". If they do it again, you can report at WP:AIV immediately. They were 173.170.175.158, of course, which got blocked and did it once more. If this continues, please ask for semi-protection, and let's hope that they tire of it. Drmies (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Drmies. I hope this IP wouldn't be blocked. However, If he continues using his hard attitude he could be. — Tomica   (talk)  22:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited All of the Lights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monster (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Loud (Rihanna album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 February newsletter
Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was, again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was, thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were, , and. February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from. At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher.

The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design.

The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk &bull; email) and The ed17 (talk &bull; email) 23:50, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Good
I'm good my friend, though it can always be better! Best, --Discographer (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision: Discussion on the use of navigation templates
Hello,

There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision on the future use of navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how these templates are organized, named, and used in future, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 15:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC).

Talkback
 S ' D ' 5  21:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Born_This_Way
Could you participate in this discussion sometime? Yeah, it's about the 8-million-thing again. I asked you because I know you aren't a fan of Gaga. :-) I really want to start a discussion instead of engaging in edit-warring and WP:POINTy behaviour. Thanks.
 * I never had an idea there was a dispute regarding the sales of the album. I will try to read the discussion and say my opinion :) !— Tomica   (talk)  22:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I made a big miscalculation then. I hate getting into messes like this. *shame* — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  22:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hehe, don't worry. It can happen to everybody. No matter of that, it's still unconfirmed regarding the 8 million sales. — Tomica   (talk)  22:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol, I just got my first "warning" ever. It feels funny. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  23:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I have had dozens of them. lol, I was a naughty boy. Do you know that I was even blocked once?:) — Tomica   (talk)  08:25, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Do Ya Thang (Rihanna song)
This has been in one of my sandboxes for ages, and you knew this. You've only done it because as part of retaliating against me. Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 11:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the same as you did with "Drunk on Love (Rihanna song)". It hurts when someone does that stuff right? — Tomica   (talk)  11:19, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't even know about Drunk on Love. Where does it even say???? Certainly not in your contributions like it does in mine. Besides, Drunk on Love had already had prose created but was under a redirect. I can tell by your response you did it out of spite. And why have you not included my name as the creator in those DYKs??? I am author one, you are author two. I listed the person who originally created Drunk on Love as author one, that's what decent people do. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 11:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Because you didn't created the articles, but yet re-directed them. For me that's not creating an article. But to show that I am descent person, you can add your name there, you have my permission, even according me, re-directing is not creating an article. And yeah, I am pretty sure you have seen I am working on "Drunk On Love" in a sandbox, so you hurried up. You are very selfish person you know? You should take example of Jivesh collaborating with My love is love on the Beyonce Knowles project. We are two, we should split work equally and no the way that you do. FACE THE FACT! I am here, I collaborate in the project. — Tomica   (talk)  11:26, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol, what do you call it then Tomica? Fact is, I created those articles. My name is there as the person who created. You expanded it. Tbh, you should add my name, not me. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 11:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yup, ignoring part two of my message. As always. — Tomica   (talk)  12:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Because you already know the answer. Everyone knows the answer. I don't like working in twos. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 12:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't mean working on every Rihanna article together, but splitting the articles on even. That's the reason for happening this kind of things. 12:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)