User talk:Tomipelegrin

Redirecting page:Help:How to_translate_an_article
I noticed that you recently created Help:How to_translate_an_article. However, there is already a help page for translation, so I have redirected the page there. See Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

No, thanks to you for helping me correcting that mistake

Proposed deletion of Petroyuan


The article Petroyuan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No good reliable sources, notability borderline to non-existent"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –eggofreason(talk &middot; contribs) 18:50, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jennifer Blaze


A tag has been placed on Jennifer Blaze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. A loose necktie (talk) 02:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Death of Kenneka Jenkins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Kenneka Jenkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Death of Kenneka Jenkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 03:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Death of Kenneka Jenkins
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

"One third (fraction)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect One third (fraction). Since you had some involvement with the One third (fraction) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 01:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Steve Coy concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Steve Coy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Steve Coy


Hello, Tomipelegrin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Steve Coy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 21:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Murder of Susan Smith moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Murder of Susan Smith, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Considering this also involves (presumably, the perp) it needs to be sourced before it's in mainspace.) Praxidicae (talk) 21:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * You should have worked on the draft rather than re-creating the article in mainspace. Userspace or draftspace are the right places to work on articles to make them complete and fully sourced before moving them to mainspace. Schazjmd   (talk)  22:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Murder of Susan Smith at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Tomipelegrin, it's been four weeks since you created the nomination page yet failed to take the final step in the nomination as noted above. Do you still wish to pursue this nomination? At some point, if we don't hear from you and you don't do anything more with the page, it will be closed. I hope you'll respond well before then. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

TWA Flight 5787
Any chance of a re-write in English and actually follow the accident report, which you cited???--Petebutt (talk) 15:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Skye Bennett


A tag has been placed on Skye Bennett, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- &#x03C6; OnePt618Talk &#x03C6;  20:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Please note: most IMDB citations are unreliable per WP:CITEIMDB; the ones you added clearly fall into this bucket because they were written by "Anonymous". -- &#x03C6; OnePt618Talk &#x03C6;  20:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Murder of Missy Bevers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Missy Bevers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Murder of Missy Bevers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 21:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sydney Cole for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sydney Cole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sydney Cole until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Amerigo Vespucci, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1800s (decade), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Francis II and French Empire ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/1800s_%28decade%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/1800s_%28decade%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glee curse
Hello Tomipelegrin,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kingsif, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Glee curse for deletion, because it appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important and/or recognized enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kingsif (talk) 20:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Glee curse for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glee curse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Glee curse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lady of  Shalott  20:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Chinese silver yuan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Chinese silver yuan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Faraz Ale Adam


A tag has been placed on Faraz Ale Adam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Northern Escapee (talk) 19:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chinese silver yuan


Hello, Tomipelegrin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chinese silver yuan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Vaccinegate moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Vaccinegate, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 14:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Vaccinegate
Hello, Tomipelegrin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vaccinegate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaccinegate (September 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vaccinegate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vaccinegate, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Vaccinegate Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Salimfadhley&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Vaccinegate reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 17:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vaccinegate


Hello, Tomipelegrin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vaccinegate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Jeffrey Dahmer
The article is related to an American case/subject. Date format needs to correspond with American English. Hope you understand. Regards, Kieronoldham (talk) 02:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Alan Turing have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  -  Sumanuil  '''. ''' (talk to me) 06:09, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hans Heinrich Euler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page URSS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Birth names in infoboxes
Hi there, this one was good, but I undid this and this for the reason given in the edit summary. I haven't checked your other recent edits, but if you recall having made similar ones, could you undo them? No big deal, but thanks anyway. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 07:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)